1 result for (book:ur1 AND session:692 AND stemmed:portion)

UR1 Section 2: Session 692 April 24, 1974 5/56 (9%) double barrack simultaneous dream Sue
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume One
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Section 2: Parallel Man, Alternate Man, and Probable Man: The Reflection of These in the Present, Private Psyche. Your Multidimensional Reality in the Now of Your Being
– Session 692: Simultaneous Dreams. Unused Areas of the Brain
– Session 692 April 24, 1974 10:03 P.M. Wednesday

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

(But not only had she done it more than once, Sue said: She could recall portions of the simultaneous dreams she’d had on some of those occasions, which was a lot more than I could claim. Grinning, she proceeded to confound me further by describing the double dreams of another class member — since, obviously, the individual in question had also had certain dream adventures that Jane and I didn’t know about. I ended up thinking that my own little experience hadn’t amounted to so much after all; but still, it had made Jane and me aware of another facet of dream life. See Note 2 for any other information on double dreams that I may assemble, as well as for an excerpt from the description Sue wrote [at my request] of a multiple-dream happening of her own.

(Dreaming two at once led me to write down a second question for Seth. I wanted him to enlarge upon the statement he’d made at 11:29 in the 690th session: “Further developments in your concepts will lead to greater activation in portions of the brain now not nearly utilized, and these in turn will trigger expansions in both psychic and biological terms.” I wondered what connection, if any, might exist between the capacity to have [and/or to remember] more than one dream at a time, and those “portions of the brain now not nearly utilized.”

[... 9 paragraphs ...]

(10:20.) In your case, you did perform an excellent accomplishment. You were aware of the simultaneous dreams, each being experienced in alternate realities. You could not at this point remember both dreams, because the physical brain apparatus could not handle the simultaneous data. This has reference to portions of the brain not used, as mentioned in this book.3

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

Now: One experience was a dream of your own, in usual terms. The other “dream” experienced simultaneously was, instead, your muddled interpretation of vital experienced reality on the part of another portion of yourself, in another reality entirely; a dimensional bleed-through. Once you are aware of such experience, most likely you will also have others in “your” dream state.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(10:43. Jane took a few moments to come out of a deep trance. Her delivery had been steady, almost fast. “I have a pretty good idea of what was said,” she told me. “And just before the session, I knew what Seth would say about your dream experience. Not that I could tell you now what he did say — but still I contained that knowledge somehow …” She also knew that the dream event tied in with my question about the “unused” portions of the brain.

[... 29 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

NotP Chapter 10: Session 794, February 21, 1977 brain orange neural double sequences
TES7 Session 290 October 3, 1966 Wendell tunnel studio reunion Crowley
TES5 Session 199 October 18, 1965 appointment Colucci Jersey radio sneezing
TES7 Session 302 November 21, 1966 Council election Skidmore article object