3 results for (book:ur1 AND session:687 AND stemmed:seth)

UR1 Section 2: Session 687 March 4, 1974 hawk worm giblets wren brain

She quotes Seth on dreams in Chapter 14 of The Seth Material, and to some extent he discusses them directly in Seth Speaks and Personal Reality. However, we’ve accumulated quite a bit of unpublished Seth material on dreams, and I’ll start looking for chances to insert some of those data in the rest of “Unknown” Reality.

2. I’d say that when he talks about the “unused portions of the brain,” that physical organ, Seth means qualities of nonphysical mind as well. We still have much to learn about the brain (let alone the mind); even though by now all sections of the brain have been probed down to the molecular level, no trace or imprint of a thought has ever been found within its tissue. As an analogy, the innate knowledge of probabilities that Seth postulates here may be related to the brain in the same way that memory evidently “happens” throughout its parts, instead of being localized in just one of them.

For material on mental and psychic expansions in old age, and the hemispheres of the brain, see the 650th session in Chapter 13 of Personal Reality. And in Chapter 21 of Seth Speaks, Seth briefly mentions the eventual activation of “new areas” in the brain to “physically take care of” past-life memories. See the 586th session at 11:02.

(“Thank you, Seth. Good night.”

UR1 Appendix 6: (For Session 687) ancient pathological article Appendix parallel

[...] I hadn’t suggested that Seth come through, so we could see what she’d produce otherwise. [...] It seems Seth-like, but also really strange. [...] Maybe I’m opening up now so that I can get part of the information this way, as well as through Seth. [...]

[...] Her material, however, wasn’t influenced by the news story, for just about a year ago Seth-Jane delivered a session for Personal Reality on the mixing of animal and man: the 648th for March 14, 1973, in Chapter 12. [...] But then, for some years Seth has been reiterating that even in our terms there is no well-defined evolutionary path leading from our ancient state to our present one.)

[...] Aside from the question of whether “evolution” in ordinary linear terms has been scientifically proven [concerning which point Jane and I have many reservations], we were drawn to the article because we thought its “factual” information might eventually supplement some of Seth’s material for “Unknown” Reality. [...]

[...] Then, as we made ready to retire, Jane announced that she was “getting” information on the subject of ancient man — but not necessarily from Seth. [...]

UR1 Section 1: Session 687 March 4, 1974 probable neurological shadowy geese race

[...] At 9:37 Jane said impatiently, “Come on, Seth … Hmm; I’ve done this a lot lately, haven’t I?” Then: “I feel him vaguely around …” And Seth continued his material on Practice Element 1.)

[...] For myself, I made intuitive connections between the regular travels of the geese and our own work rhythms in producing the Seth books.

(“Good evening, Seth.”)