1 result for (book:ur1 AND session:685 AND stemmed:statement)

UR1 Appendix 4: (For Session 685) 7/31 (23%) sidepools neurological bypass Saratoga linear
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume One
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Appendix 4: Sidepools of Consciousness. Probable Neurological Connections and New Memories
– (For Session 685)

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

(Within 15 minutes of finishing her statement, Jane spontaneously began writing a second, longer one. She produced it in an altered state of consciousness — albeit a sort of grudging one, as her subsequent notes show. But first the material: She regards its method of reception, as well as its content, as representing breakthroughs of a kind for her, and because both that reception and content are related to “Unknown” Reality we’re presenting considerable portions of the statement here:)

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

(Now here, Jane told me later, she began moving into a different, hard-to-define, “strange” state of altered awareness. At the same time she began casting her material in the third person. Ruburt, “him,” “he” — entered in; yet [as she was to note in a subsequent statement] she wasn’t picking up on Seth:)

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

(I kept Jane busy! That afternoon, after we’d discussed her second statement of the day, I asked her to write a description of the circumstances surrounding her reception of it. So for the third time that day she led off a page with the date:)

“February 26, 1974. At Rob’s request this morning I wrote a statement about my experience in the sleep state last night. Today, Tuesday, is my ESP class day, which means that I have a little less time for my writing, so after giving Rob the small description I intended to type a chapter of Adventures in Consciousness.4 I’d lost some writing time lately because of business matters, and because I was trying to catch up on the mail, so I was particularly concerned about getting back to Adventures.

“Instead, I felt myself entering another level of consciousness. I grumbled for a minute, wondering if I wanted to go along or end it and type. Then I thought that something important might be up; and I ‘knew’ that this-whatever it was-was connected with my experiences of last night. So I went along, and wrote my second statement of the day.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

“Toward the end of the material (in the second statement) I briefly thought the Seth level might be involved, but the wording didn’t come through as automatically and smoothly as it does with Seth, and I didn’t feel his … personality. The information referred to me as Ruburt, though, which automatically meant that it was from a ‘higher’ or other level than the Ruburt one. Yet I dislike the connotations called up by my use of the word ‘higher’ here.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(There’s much to be learned here, Jane said in conclusion, providing she can find the time for study. An interesting question: According to the feelings she expressed toward the end of her third statement, Seth himself evidently isn’t represented by [or called out of] such a sidepool of consciousness — yet what sort of connection might, or does, he have with one? We haven’t asked yet.)

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

UR1 Appendix 6: (For Session 687) ancient pathological article Appendix parallel
UR1 Section 1: Session 686 February 27, 1974 neurological selectivity carriage pulses corporal
UR1 Section 2: Session 688 March 6, 1974 cu dolphins holes cell neurological
NoME Part One: Chapter 2: Session 806, July 30, 1977 memory events past floating future