1 result for (book:ur1 AND session:684 AND stemmed:inner AND stemmed:sens)

UR1 Section 1: Session 684 February 20, 1974 6/54 (11%) units fluctuates poised blink selectivity
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume One
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Section 1: You and the “Unknown” Reality
– Session 684: CU’s, EE Units, and the Body. “The Cells Precognate.” Heredity and Precognition
– Session 684 February 20, 1974 9:42 P.M. Wednesday

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(“For those of you who do accompany me, I promise you an adventure, a creative alteration of consciousness, and experiences beyond those that you have known in your terms. You look at the world around you and are amazed at its richness and variety. Do you think that the inner world is not as rich, even more rich, more valid? Do you think there is but one kind of consciousness?

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

(Pause.) As these units approach physical structure, however, they do slow down in your terms. Electrons, for example, are slow dullards in comparison with EE units.1 It goes without saying that the units of consciousness are “mental,” or if you prefer, disembodied, though from their inner organization all physical forms emerge. Certain intensities are built up of unit organization even before the smallest physical particle, or even invisible “physical” particle, exists. These units form what you think of as the mind, around which the structure of the brain is formulated. The units permeate the brain.

The great communication system within the body itself is dependent, then, upon the constant inner flux and flow of these units. On one level the body’s very survival is largely determined by the units’ propensities for selectivity and significance. Also, however, the body’s physical reality is a seeming constant in a seemingly constant physical existence.

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

It is impossible for you to examine an atom, a cell, or anything else except in your now. Period. Because your sense experience follows a time pattern that you can understand, then you take it for granted that a cell, for example, is the result of its past, and that its present condition arises from the past.4 The fetus grows into an adult, not because it is programmed from the past, but because it is to some extent precognitively aware of its probabilities, and from the “future” then imprints this information into the past structure.

From your viewpoint, however, an examination of a cell will not show you that, but only its present condition. It should appear obvious from what I am saying that neither future nor past is predetermined. From your platform of poised now-experience, you alter both the past and the future, and that alteration, that change, that action, causes your point of immediate sense life.5

[... 11 paragraphs ...]

The body’s innate knowledge, then, will try to translate itself often into psychological activity that may result in hunches, premonitions, and so forth. The senses may be utilized to clarify the message. You might hear a voice mentally, for example, or see a flashing image. According to your beliefs, you may interpret such data in any of many ways, but because such experiences are not an accepted part of recognized, official activity, they can appear frightening. Period. You may assign them to “spirits” or disembodied personalities, but in such a way that these are thrown together in a confusing mass of dogma or superstition.

[... 21 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

UR1 Section 1: Session 686 February 27, 1974 neurological selectivity carriage pulses corporal
UR1 Section 1: Session 683 February 18, 1974 bulb multipersonhood personhood units herd
UR1 Section 1: Session 685 February 25, 1974 Preface network selectivity desultorily ostensibly
UR1 Section 1: Session 682 February 13, 1974 units propensities unpredictability probable selection