but

1 result for (book:ur1 AND session:684 AND stemmed:but)

UR1 Section 1: Session 684 February 20, 1974 9/54 (17%) units fluctuates poised blink selectivity
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume One
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Section 1: You and the “Unknown” Reality
– Session 684: CU’s, EE Units, and the Body. “The Cells Precognate.” Heredity and Precognition
– Session 684 February 20, 1974 9:42 P.M. Wednesday

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(“For those of you who do accompany me, I promise you an adventure, a creative alteration of consciousness, and experiences beyond those that you have known in your terms. You look at the world around you and are amazed at its richness and variety. Do you think that the inner world is not as rich, even more rich, more valid? Do you think there is but one kind of consciousness?

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

Now: These units of consciousness (CU’s) move faster than the speed of light, then — but that statement itself is meaningless in a way, since the units exist outside as well as inside the framework in which light itself has meaning.

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

(Slower at 10:07:) Your body’s condition at any time is not so much the result of its own comprehension of its “past history” as it is the result of its own comprehension of future probabilities. The cells precognate. This is being simplified for now. I will make it clearer later in the book.2 But your limited ideas of time cause conceptual barriers that operate even when you consider the structure of physical biological life.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

It is impossible for you to examine an atom, a cell, or anything else except in your now. Period. Because your sense experience follows a time pattern that you can understand, then you take it for granted that a cell, for example, is the result of its past, and that its present condition arises from the past.4 The fetus grows into an adult, not because it is programmed from the past, but because it is to some extent precognitively aware of its probabilities, and from the “future” then imprints this information into the past structure.

From your viewpoint, however, an examination of a cell will not show you that, but only its present condition. It should appear obvious from what I am saying that neither future nor past is predetermined. From your platform of poised now-experience, you alter both the past and the future, and that alteration, that change, that action, causes your point of immediate sense life.5

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(10:35. Jane’s pace had been slow often, but emphatic throughout. Resume in the same manner at 10:49.)

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

It is almost impossible to begin with concepts of one isolated universe, one self at the mercy of its past, one time sequence, and end up with any acceptable theory of a multidimensional soul or godhead that is anything else but a glorified personified concept of what you think man is.6

Not only do your metaphysics and sciences suffer, but your daily experience as a human being is far less than it could be. There are, then, probabilities quite present, and for that matter biologically practical, that would allow for a change in individual consciousness so great as literally to propel the race into another level of experience entirely. As in your terms the cavemen ventured out into the daylight of the earth, there is a time for man to venture out into a greater knowledge of his subjective reality, comma, to explore the dimensions of selfhood and go beyond the small areas of himself in which he has thus far found shelter.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

The body’s innate knowledge, then, will try to translate itself often into psychological activity that may result in hunches, premonitions, and so forth. The senses may be utilized to clarify the message. You might hear a voice mentally, for example, or see a flashing image. According to your beliefs, you may interpret such data in any of many ways, but because such experiences are not an accepted part of recognized, official activity, they can appear frightening. Period. You may assign them to “spirits” or disembodied personalities, but in such a way that these are thrown together in a confusing mass of dogma or superstition.

[... 21 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

UR1 Section 1: Session 686 February 27, 1974 neurological selectivity carriage pulses corporal
UR1 Section 1: Session 683 February 18, 1974 bulb multipersonhood personhood units herd
UR1 Section 1: Session 685 February 25, 1974 Preface network selectivity desultorily ostensibly
UR1 Section 1: Session 682 February 13, 1974 units propensities unpredictability probable selection