“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(11:33. Half humorously:) Before my comments for Ruburt: I thought that my risqué remark about “no holds barred” was quite in keeping with the content of the material, (on human sexuality). It is difficult to be prissy when discussing such a topic—but if you feel that others might be offended, do as you wish.

It should not upset him unduly then if it seems to him that he makes “the wrong decision” at any given time, for the process of becoming aware of the impulses is now the important issue, and then to decide between them. He was feeling particularly “brave” this morning. Some ideas for Seven came, and the impulse to write them down. At the same time an inhibited impulse arose—to go to the bathroom—that he had ignored. He allowed them both to arise together. This resulted in conscious conflict before avoided, and a series of conflicting thoughts and impulses.

He thought he should write, and he wanted to. The impulse was strong. His bodily impulse to move and to go to the bathroom was even stronger. He decided to do that, but felt guilty. He then swept the kitchen, because the body wanted the motion, and so did he.

In such cases, however, and with your understanding, he should feel free to call on you, regardless of what you are doing. This will be easier on you also in the long run. Such issues only arise at certain stages. His mood was so bad because he felt that he could not win no matter what he did. If he had written instead, he thought, then he would have been denying the body impulses. The “error” was simply a result of a series of such denied impulses, that he then let loose at once. It is far better, however, to do that and learn than to deny the impulses altogether.