1 result for (book:tps1 AND session:563 AND stemmed:session)

TPS1 Session 563 (Deleted) December 2, 1970 13/77 (17%) noncontact tendencies spontaneity role relationship
– The Personal Sessions: Book 1 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2016 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 563 (Deleted) December 2, 1970

SESSION 563 (DELETED)

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(This session, ordinarily the 563rd for December 2, 1970, is deleted from the record.)

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

When your relationship becomes uneasy to a certain degree, then this impedes the spontaneity that you allow yourself in your paintings. You are at that point trying to shove beneath awareness certain feelings of yours, mentioned in our last session. You are, say, close to the point on noncontact. Inhibited feelings therefore are at their strongest on your part. Considerable energy is used to continue the repression as the pressure from beneath grows.

[... 26 paragraphs ...]

Because of this role, adopted rather early on both of your parts in your married life, and because of his dim, distorted and hidden perception of it, he was vastly astonished at your permissive attitude when our sessions began.

You were therefore expected by him to keep the sessions from getting out of hand, to help in quotes “police” his spontaneous self here, as you did in the sexual area and in your personal relationship. To him this was logical, if subconscious, expectation.

Instead you see, you felt with some considerable exceptions that in this particular area spontaneity could be safely followed. When you encouraged the sessions in the beginning so strongly, he was taken back for to him you were not fulfilling the implied role. When you urged him onward then he felt that he might be on dangerous ground, for you had been counted upon in the personal area to stop spontaneity, emotionally and sexually.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

He was unused to setting himself up against his own spontaneity so strongly, yet when you did show signs of drawing the line, say, at fear of spontaneous sessions fairly early in the game, he felt on the one hand relieved, and on the other angry at giving up this new prerogative.

Your inner feelings toward each other have been projected onto your feelings toward the sessions, and psychic work also, then. You became annoyed at him, wondering why the spontaneous woman had suddenly turned so restrictive. You did not understand that this was because you had not carried through the personal pattern into the session pattern.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

He then got into the habit of checking the spontaneous self at every point, and setting up opposing muscular reactions and tensions. It was simply not possible for me to give you more information at that time than I could. It was precisely, you see, the relationship between spontaneity and discipline operating between yourselves, that was projected upon the sessions, and inhibited any spontaneous comments I could make.

[... 20 paragraphs ...]

For our next few sessions I will work on our book, do a few chapters, and then if you prefer take some time out for reincarnational material, so that it does not go by the board.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Now do you have any questions on the last session, this one, or allied subjects that you want cleared up before we resume dictation next week?

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

Then we will close the session. You have both learned a lot this week. My heartiest regards to you both.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(11 :10. Jane’s trance had been good, her pace a little slower than last Monday. I regard Monday’s session and today’s as two of the best Jane has given. It’s difficult to see how the material could be more apropos, etc.)

Similar sessions

TPS1 Session 562 (Deleted) November 30, 1970 noncontact divorce secrecy both sexual
TPS1 Session 490 (Deleted) June 25, 1969 controls symptoms Saratoga restraints issue
TPS2 Deleted Session June 30, 1973 distractions youthful curtailment backslidings noise
TPS5 Deleted Session January 3, 1979 conscientious perfectionist gloried virtuous inferior