“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

You could also serve more brilliantly (humorously) in that capacity. The third aspect could end up draining your energies. This second possibility therefore is a good one and would work highly to your advantage. The third is a one- man show. A department initiated by you, and a relatively new service in this area—I believe it has been adopted and sometimes discarded in other areas—but it is not an ordinary issue, and it is something that you have considered yourself in the past, though not seriously.

It is a new service, and would take place generally speaking within the same framework within which you now operate. In one way it could be called an offshoot from another department, but it is too novel to be so described. It would set you up, and would be not so much a merger as a completely new development of your own initiation.

It seems you have either read of, or met, or heard of, someone else who tried this, with mixed reaction. There is a public-service issue involved in here, and a way of squaring away old debts. It involves the creative use of money through diversification, and diversity is the key word here.

Such a service could be born within your framework, and become an important part of other banks. You would have your finger on the economic pulse-beat of the area, and you could diagnose business ills before they occurred —banking preventative medicine, you see, and you could have the preventive medicine at your fingertips and be ready to apply it.

We will have a session some evening for our friend here. (Virginia.) There is no particular benefit to your moving at this time, and the venture of which I have spoken would do best if begun here; and if it is begun here it would spread, but this would be its focal point and the point of overall management. It would need you see an informal hand, and every effort should be made not to intimidate the small businessmen who would be coming for help and service.