“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

There is still considerable coloration, but this is to be expected, and you will work through it. Much of the reincarnational material that you have is symbolically valid. The psychological insights are valid in that material although you do not always understand their true validity. The reincarnational material in one way is still codified, and you have not yet the key, but you will find it.

The psychological understanding of yourself is hidden within the reincarnational data that you have. You must still however learn to interpret that material, and look behind for its implications. Now much of the stability in your endeavor is also being provided by our other friend here (Virginia), for without the bedrock you would not find it as easy to lift one spiritual toe from the barren ground. You did not trust the ground, seeing that it was not always so fruitful, but at last you felt you could trust it.

An issue here, it seems can arise within a 6-month period, that you should face with tact. (Pause. Seth now looked at Tom.) And his initial reaction, his initial ideas to this issue, will give way to a more reasoning attitude. His initial idea therefore will not be the best one.

(9:52. Jane was again out of trance easily, but said it had been a good one.

(Virginia and Tom verified Seth’s data concerning the family relationship, tensions, two women, etc. In fact, with the exception of the 6-month prediction, they tied all of the data together quite easily around one family situation; they explained the situation to Jane and me, but it will be but briefly summarized here. Any clarification or reference to this material will be furnished by the Milligans because of their intimate acquaintance with it.

There seem to be three main branches here, or possibilities. There could also be a merging of three into one.

Now. The three-into-one has one inherent weakness, and strong organization would be needed or the venture could be severely weakened. The weakening element would be largely concentrated in the choice of one individual within the organization as a focal point.

You can be too conservative, not following up sufficiently your intuitive understanding of the business. There is one man important in the three-in-one merger, and the best man has not yet been found.

We will return briefly, ourselves now, to the business world. And to our lady (Virginia), who prefers to stay in one place. There is creative opportunity for you here, within the framework in which you are now involved, within the general framework.

Two mergers would seem to represent your best opportunity, two rather than three, and you could maintain excellent control here. One element therefore would be dropped, and it would prove in the overall not as effective as it would seem—one could be a liability, and might need to be discarded even if at first included. Two mergers would be much more effective.

You could also serve more brilliantly (humorously) in that capacity. The third aspect could end up draining your energies. This second possibility therefore is a good one and would work highly to your advantage. The third is a one- man show. A department initiated by you, and a relatively new service in this area—I believe it has been adopted and sometimes discarded in other areas—but it is not an ordinary issue, and it is something that you have considered yourself in the past, though not seriously.

It is a new service, and would take place generally speaking within the same framework within which you now operate. In one way it could be called an offshoot from another department, but it is too novel to be so described. It would set you up, and would be not so much a merger as a completely new development of your own initiation.

Now we cannot cover too many issues in one evening.

Now. The word clinic was a good one, and an intuitive, one, and it is a key for you.

Again, you are doing very well. Bega is learning my material in our own classes, but he must also interpret this, and as I said earlier he tailors it for you, knowing you so well. Now, I adopt the personality that you know, and it is quite legitimate, but it is only one of my personalities. Know then that other personalities are also here, and in ways that you do not understand, and that is the end of the sentence. (To me, humorously.) The familiar human component is necessary, and it is by my characteristics that you know me, but the entity is an ancient one, and we are far more concerned with other things than your position at your bank.