but

1 result for (book:tes9 AND session:431 AND stemmed:but)

TES9 Session 431 August 26, 1968 9/35 (26%) number row unit shafts behind
– The Early Sessions: Book 9 of The Seth Material
– © 2014 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 431 August 26, 1968 9:19 PM Monday

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(Seth’s entity or larger personality spoke for the session. As usual the voice was high and thin, very clear but distant, and with many pauses at times. Once again most of Jane’s sentences ended on an upbeat inflection.

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

It is as if each number represents not only the number itself, not only a unit to be added, subtracted, multiplied or divided, but also as if each number had infinite varieties of intensities that you do not perceive. I am not talking of smaller units within that number, but of the nature of the unit itself.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

Pretend then that behind or within but unseen by you, behind or within the number 1, for example, there are an infinite number of other 1’s, lined up so to speak behind the one that you see. (Jane leaned forward, gesturing:) The one that you see is the self that you see or recognize within your system. The 1’s behind are not serial, nor identical, nor duplicates.

They are all however variations, but neither one is patterned upon any other. Each number in our original quote “row” that you see has therefore within it these other individual units.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

This sort of expansion and contraction has nothing to do with addition or subtraction, multiplication or division; but it is an inherent quality of all units.

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

They are not multidimensional symbols. Your physicists can theorize to a certain point. The blockage occurs because the symbols used to portray reality are themselves limited by the reality that you know. They are like keys that will only fit your own doors. You can open endless doors with them, but only doors within your own system.

For this reason your ideas of time and identity remain limited. Now. Other dimensional realities do appear within your system but you do not recognize them. We can acquaint you with some of these. We can tell you what they appear like within your own reality. (Long pause.)

You can learn to experience some of these, and the experience of no-time is a particular facet to which I am referring. The experience itself will automatically to some extent allow you to understand the dimensions of your own identity, but old familiar props will not be available.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(10:19. Once again the abrupt ending. Jane slowly came out of a good trance; she patted the top of her head as she did so, several times. “I keep trying to stuff all of myself back inside my head,” she said. “Most of me is down here,” she said, patting the chair, “waiting for the rest of me. The part down here doesn’t know anything about numbers. I don’t know whether the data’s good or not—but the part up there just goes on giving it...”

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES5 Session 219 January 3, 1966 Lorraine Bunn test box Mansfield
TES6 Session 252 April 20, 1966 sculpture bronze Bill column Macdonnel
TES6 Session 265 June 6, 1966 Marilyn ceramic bricks Wilburs object
UR2 Section 6: Session 740 February 26, 1975 infinities infinite Millers Corio finite