1 result for (book:tes7 AND session:290 AND stemmed:point)
6/121 (5%)
Wendell
tunnel
studio
reunion
Crowley
[... 50 paragraphs ...]
(Jane now opened the double sealed envelopes and examined the object, as she always does at break. At first it had little meaning for her, and as is often the case she said the data obtained pertaining to it was incorrect. True, the data was not as specific as it has often been, but it did contain a number of valid points. Some of these were subjective on our part.
[... 7 paragraphs ...]
(“A double, or something twice, or a negative.” Relatively little of the data refers to the envelope object itself. Instead the empty envelope from Wendell serves as a springboard. This data is a case in point. After break Seth agrees with Jane and me when we assign the double or twice mentioned here to the frequent use of the numeral 2 on the second page of Wendell’s letter.
[... 35 paragraphs ...]
(Seth called for break after the second question, taking me by surprise. Usually I can ask more questions, and attempt them without being leading about it. I owe Wendell a letter, and may ask him to clear up some of the points mentioned in the data, and by Seth after break. It is however difficult to explain briefly in a letter just why such questions are necessary, and so Jane and I usually forego trying. But any additional information obtained will be attached to this session at a later date.
[... 10 paragraphs ...]
(We of course have no idea whether Wendell wrote someone in Michigan just before or after writing us on May 26,1966, nor do we know anything about the names given above. These will be points to ask him about if I decide to explain the envelope material to him.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
(This passage may be somewhat distorted. I do not know that it is possible to travel part way through a tunnel, then park. Seth/Jane may have meant that Wendell drove to New York City via one of the tunnels, then parked at the tunnel exit, which is possible, and took a subway to the restaurant, rather than one in New Jersey. Another point to check out with Wendell.)
The studio connection was legitimate, but Ruburt associated it with you primarily when two studios were involved. These are the main points.
[... 10 paragraphs ...]
