1 result for (book:tes7 AND session:290 AND stemmed:photograph)
6/121 (5%)
Wendell
tunnel
studio
reunion
Crowley
[... 39 paragraphs ...]
The number four. (Pause.) Some connection with a February event. A scramble. Black and white colors. A photograph. Ruburt here thinks of the photographs taken in your studio, of him.
The photograph connection is strong (pause) but I do not believe the item is this precisely. (Pause.)
There seems to be a dual impression of printed matter with a photograph. (Jane now spelled the following out:) M-i-s-s-i-n-c or e-n-c. One thirty-five.
[... 37 paragraphs ...]
(“A photograph. Ruburt here thinks of the photographs taken in your studio, of him.” The picture data begins to emerge again. Seth here mentions some test photos I took of Jane in my studio here last week. Studio is the link here with Wendell’s letter, and hence the envelope object. In his letter Wendell specifically mentions the studio we artists shared back in 1941-3.
(“The photograph connection is strong [pause] but I do not believe the item is this precisely.” [Pause.] Seth tried to help Jane discriminate here, as he often does. Tonight’s object of course is not a picture or photo, but an envelope that contained a letter about people who make pictures. Also, I was taking pictures of Jane last week, as explained. Thus it can be seen how all such related data, even though separated by much time, comes together in these session experiments. This particular chain of association was not anticipated by me when I picked the Crowley envelope as object for tonight. The two studio settings—the studio I worked in with Wendell Crowley in 1941-3, and my present studio, are separated by as much as 23 years.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
(“There seems to be a dual impression of printed matter with a photograph.” Seth comes even closer with this data. He deals with the photo-picture-artist impressions on the one hand, and the actual envelope object, containing both printing and typing, on the other. We regard this as good data. Tonight’s empty object also contained Wendell’s typed letter. In the past Seth, or Jane, has used lettering, typing, writing and printing interchangeably. Thus it is possible that tonight “printing” could refer to both the printing and typing on Wendell’s envelope, and to the letter it had contained.
[... 37 paragraphs ...]
