1 result for (book:tes7 AND session:290 AND stemmed:am)
6/121 (5%)
Wendell
tunnel
studio
reunion
Crowley
[... 45 paragraphs ...]
I am not sure, though the number 17 seems connected to it, or 14, between the 14th and the 17th of February. And a connection with an older man here.
[... 7 paragraphs ...]
(Seth will occasionally comment about the lack of emotional impetus surrounding an object if I pick one that happens to bear little charge. I cannot be sure that I am choosing an object that carries little charge, however, for Seth’s data will often shoot off at an angle entirely unexpected by me. This data can be related to the envelope object in a variety of quite valid ways. I make no conscious effort to dwell on the object chosen for an envelope experiment, and when I do choose an object it is usually a spur-of-the-moment decision.
[... 22 paragraphs ...]
(“Some connection with a February event.” Wendell’s letter of May 26 was in answer to a letter I wrote him last February. I do not have a copy of my letter, but am sure it was written in February because Wendell discusses my references to snow and poor weather. Our weather last winter was quite peculiar—we had no snow at all until the massive three-day storm of February 1, one of the worst in local history. Seth has more to say about February in answer to my first question.
[... 7 paragraphs ...]
(“One thirty-five.” My hunch was that this referred either to the end of the reunion discussed in Wendell’s letter—at 1:35 AM, or the time Wendell himself left the party. Inspection of his letter showed that Wendell states “I left at about 12:30 AM,” but that other member of the party remained after he left. Seth is more specific after break.
[... 5 paragraphs ...]
(First Question: What’s that connection with a February event? “I am not sure, though the number 17 seems connected to it, or 14, between the 14th and the 17th of February.” As explained, the object for tonight contained a letter written by Wendell Crowley in answer to my letter of last February. My letter could well have been written between February 14 and 17.
[... 13 paragraphs ...]
(See page 78.) Too disconnected, I am afraid. Your friend wrote a letter to a man in Michigan, immediately before or after writing this letter. This was the M also—a name something like Murray. No, more like Musach—
[... 15 paragraphs ...]
