but

1 result for (book:tes6 AND session:244 AND stemmed:but)

TES6 Session 244 March 23, 1966 15/93 (16%) Peggy locations photograph envelope switch
– The Early Sessions: Book 6 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 244 March 23, 1966 9 PM Wednesday as Scheduled

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(Sometimes Jane has seen envelope objects, and sometimes she has not. Sometimes she has seen them but a few days before, sometimes months or years before. Whatever the case may be, it apparently makes no difference in the results as far as time goes, or previous visual contact. Seth does respond to emotional charges; these charges we have learned need not stem from Jane or myself or a friend; they can be related to a total stranger and still be detected. Someday perhaps these envelope experiments can be correlated with various factors, sensual and otherwise. For some time now we have kept a weather record, taken just before session time, and there are probably correlations here. This record includes time, temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, rainfall to date, wind velocity and wind direction. Soon I will make a copy of the chart to include with these sessions.

(There may also be correlations via dreams but we haven’t made any effort to study this, nor has Seth been asked.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

(The session began at 9:06. Seth was in a very good mood at its opening but quickly became serious. Jane’s pace was good from the beginning. Her eyes were closed, her manner brisk and with many gestures, her voice average in timbre.)

[... 11 paragraphs ...]

When you are dealing with dream locations you are not dealing with mass-perceptions, but with personal perceptions. There is no need therefore for any complicated arrangements calculated to insure agreement between persons as to location in space.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Each dream location is created by the individual precisely in the same way that I have explained to you; that is, they do not differ basically from physical locations, but in one degree. The difference is mainly that they need not be perceived by others.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(See sessions 42-45. But as early as the 15th session Seth was discussing these problems as related to dreams. All in Volume 1.)

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(Break at 9:22. Jane had been dissociated as usual for a first delivery. Her pace had been good, her voice a bit stronger than usual, her eyes had remained closed. Jane said she had noticed the flash but had not been bothered by it when Peggy took the pictures.

(Peggy was having trouble composing a picture, she said, so for the next delivery she had Jane and me seat ourselves in another part of the room. We also moved about later in the session, but Jane kept using her favorite session chair, our Kennedy rocker.

[... 9 paragraphs ...]

For Ruburt then: When the physical body lies in bed, that physical body is separated by a vast distance from the dream location in which the dreaming self may dwell. But this distance, dear friends, has nothing to do with space. For the dream location exists simultaneously with the room in which the body dwells.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

In the first place, the chest and bed and chair are only the results of your perception, and of your physical perception. From energy you form patterns which you recognize, and give names to and use, but the utility of these objects is useless to you unless you are focused within the dimension for which they were specifically formed.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

It cannot be too strongly stressed that these dream locations are actualities. But as a rule they are personal actualities, without a general (underline general) mass framework. However mass dreams do occur (underlined). There are dreams that you share with others. There are dream environments that you share, as you share your physical environment. These are not as limiting however as that framework that holds together your physical reality. Nevertheless it does exist.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

A brown object, small, of wallet size, containing plastic partitions. I do not believe it belongs to Dr. Instream, but to another male.

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

There is some connection here also with a young girl, a child connected with Dr. Instream, but not with the symposium.

[... 18 paragraphs ...]

(We believe we have made some progress checking Seth’s impressions in this case, and they involve Bill Macdonnel, John Bradley, and Peggy Gallagher among others. It isn’t necessary here to go into these points in detail one by one, either in the data on page 32, or on the envelope object. But we do believe these excerpts from page 32 apply to Peggy and her place of employment, the local newspaper: “A crisis involving health. A doctor… A connection with a man who can be considered an outsider to a group. He is connected with the crisis.”

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

(“A bright color suggesting sunlight.” We don’t know. A reference to the flashgun? Peggy took three shots of Jane during the envelope data. The sunlight reference is one occurring once in a while in the envelope data, and sometimes involves circles of bright colors. The object tonight is white paper, but then many objects are.

[... 12 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES4 Session 192 September 25, 1965 silt lake artifacts cove Bill
TES6 Session 243 March 21, 1966 receipt handstamp motor bottom March
TES6 Session 256 May 4, 1966 Berry Mrs photo article antidote
TES5 Session 223 January 16, 1966 teapot Brotzanin Lemons voyages Zanzibar