1 result for (book:tes3 AND session:89 AND stemmed:man)
[... 10 paragraphs ...]
The other man was not involved with any of you in past lives, nor do I see him indeed at all in England in any era. Instead the Mediterranean area in the 1500’s, and it is from this period that his present speech impediment indeed originated.
The impediment, beginning in this life, 1507, represented a time when he did not speak out, and he should have, for a man’s life was at stake. He did not speak out because of fear, and now when he wishes most to speak out he cannot.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
There was an army from another country, an invasion. A man in his company was thought to be disloyal. This man—
[... 1 paragraph ...]
—was thought to be the disloyal member. He denied it; but when they decided that another innocent man was the culprit, a man whom he knew to be innocent, then to save his own life he let them think the innocent man was the betrayer.
[... 6 paragraphs ...]
And, he knows the man whom he once so betrayed. In this life he knows him, and he—
[... 1 paragraph ...]
—he has been kind to him, and he has given up much for this man whom he once, out of fear, betrayed.
[... 5 paragraphs ...]
It is indeed a basic anxiety and fear. The personality can express himself very well. In the 1500’s he was eloquent, and it is precisely because this eloquence, so persuasive, so smooth-tongued, caused his superiors at that time to believe the accusations against the innocent man, that he now fears to use an eloquence, because he once let it run away with him.
[... 7 paragraphs ...]
He has taken at least as much as he gave, and there were sly and secret ways in which the father repaid him. Yet here we have further conflict, because indeed the present father loves the present son. It is not the son that he would wound. It is the man that son once was.
[... 22 paragraphs ...]
If this is realized then the personality will not feel smothered. As it is, how can he dare express himself in the presence particularly of a man whom he feels he once betrayed? And when he speaks to him in syllables, he does not speak clearly. He does not owe the father any more than a normal filial devotion. He does not owe the father any more than that, and to seek the father’s pleasure superficially, or to try to please the father in fields where he has no interest, will not lead either to personal development or success, and will not help the father in any way.
[... 14 paragraphs ...]