1 result for (book:tes3 AND session:104 AND stemmed:futur)

TES3 Session 104 November 4, 1964 5/84 (6%) Jimmy sale warning dump rush
– The Early Sessions: Book 3 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 104 November 4, 1964 9 PM Wednesday as Scheduled

[... 44 paragraphs ...]

You are allowing more of this through than previously. The images will come more clearly within the near future. More data could be received by you, and will be as you allow further data to emerge from the images; that is, feelings that emanate, say, from the images of the people. You are somewhat closed down to these, which add extra and necessary dimension that would round out and focus the information.

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

My most sincere wishes to you both. One note further: The sale has developed at this time, and future sales have been set into motion through stories. That is all.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

(Concerning Jane making sale of her writing soon, the last statement of the session above now makes four times that this bit of information has come to us, either through sessions or Jane’s psychological time. See pages 102, 107, 114, and 125. In writing out the last line of the session from Jane’s dictation, I took it for granted the information referred to one sale. Jane then told me, as soon as the session ended, that it referred to two sales; one now accomplished, and other future sales. While we were discussing this point, Jane suddenly resumed her feet and began dictating again. Her manner and voice were more subdued now, and grew progressively quieter and slower as she talked. I will indicate pauses where they took place. Resume at 10:26.)

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Future sales having to do with stories will result in the near future. These have not yet actually developed, but the framework that will ensure them has already been laid.

[... 14 paragraphs ...]

(Now in the very beginning, I felt a sudden need for Rob. * Quite emotional, as if he was dead and I wanted him. Spoke his name in ejaculation in my mind. Quick intense sorrow. Had just thought consciously how much he meant to me. Feeling vanished. I forgot it until now. Rather unsettling. I asked mentally if Rob was in any trouble, got no answer. [As I wrote this down, in the second sentence with the * I found myself substituting Rob’s name, no, Walt’s name for Rob’s. Maybe something happened to Walt? Notice the correction in last sentence—there wasn’t any sense of danger; sorrow after an event? Nor did it seem particularly an immediate event, or even necessarily one in near future.]

[... 11 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES3 Session 100 October 26, 1964 Jimmy j.j Marian thermostat Jeep
TES4 Session 191 September 22, 1965 Blanche pseudoimage landscape waterfall landlord
TES6 Session 248 April 4, 1966 Doug transparencies ball music Betts
TES6 Session 246 March 30, 1966 pointer Wyoming Jimmy young Marilyn