1 result for (book:tes1 AND session:25 AND stemmed:what AND stemmed:realiti)

TES1 Session 25 February 12, 1964 11/90 (12%) duality phonograph recorder plane camera
– The Early Sessions: Book 1 of The Seth Material
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 25 February 12, 1964 9 PM Wednesday as Instructed

[... 19 paragraphs ...]

In many primitive communities, these communications are accepted as reality. In your civilization as a whole, they are not. I know that you will tell me, my dear Joseph, when your hand is tired, and we will break.

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

The trouble is in ESP investigations, that you are using the wrong tools again. You are taking this dual self for granted again. Until you realize that there is one self, and not one self who does and manipulates and another self who breathes and dreams, you will get nowhere quickly. Investigations carried on according to what is considered scientific precepts are doomed in a large measure to slow-motion tactics at best, and to complete failure at worst.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

The fact is that when you insist upon evidence through the outside, regularly accepted senses, that you almost automatically turn off the inner sense apparatus. This is not necessary. Man to a large degree has set up this habit reaction. It is not a natural habit reaction. You must take the inner data at its face value, and this is what you will not do. Once you take this first step of spontaneity, you will actually receive evidence that even your conscious mind will be forced to accept. But the first step of such willingness must be made.

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

(Break at 10:00. Before turning off the recorder Jane spoke into it, saying that if I could write faster she could talk faster. In regard to her fast pacing, she said it was no effort at all, that she felt as though she could “take off.” Nor does she have any idea “of what I am going to say next, or anything.”

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

The point I wanted to make earlier was that evidence of what you call ESP will be arrived at. But as you receive evidence of sound through the ears and do not ordinarily expect to see through your ears, so the evidence must come through the correct channels. One of your main difficulties is that you will not accept as evidence anything which is not perceivable in one manner or another through the outer senses. That is, you will not consider an experience as valid unless it can be demonstrated as physical camouflage reality.

[... 11 paragraphs ...]

The emotions, while connected to the ego strongly, nevertheless also belong to what we have been pleased to call the subconscious. But because they are so intertwined with the inner life they are also common to both the ego and the so-called subconscious.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

What you call racial memory exists as inner emotional memory experience. The line between inner and outer does not exist in actuality any more than a line exists between consciousness and unconsciousness. What you call the subconscious is merely an ill-defined meeting place of inner and outer experience; and I am forced to use these terms inner and outer only because of your misconception of duality.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

The term ESP in itself is a result of this artificial duality, maintaining as it does that anything not perceived through the outer senses is therefore extra and tacked on, so to speak. But this, dear friends, will pass. In the first place, your most pragmatic scientist is even now forced to admit, as even Ruburt knows, that solid objects are not solid; and the interesting sidelight of this fact must be that your faithful, tried and true, so-called dependable outer senses are in reality lovely liars, since the eyes see a chair as solid while the chair is not solid at all.

The outside senses are therefore fabricators of the most delightful sort. What will you ever do when you discover that everything your senses tell you is, in a most basic manner, false? Will you then stop operating in a physical world of physical objects? I doubt it very much.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(“I see what you mean.”)

[... 1 paragraph ...]

What you are pleased to call the subconscious represents merely the part of the inner senses, or of the inner self, that even your society can no longer ignore. And this is indeed only the surface. Here you find of course the repository for personal memories, and not of personal egobound conscious memories either, but also of psychological experiences that the ego itself prefers to forget.

[... 23 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES3 Session 96 October 12, 1964 gestalt Trinity unitary primary plane
UR1 Appendix 8: (For Session 690) ocean climate plunge camouflage likened
SDPC Part Two: Chapter 9 clock sensation Miss Rob twenty
TES3 Session 86 September 9, 1964 enclosure copper tube September incense