1 result for (book:ss AND session:530 AND stemmed:present)

SS Part One: Chapter 7: Session 530, May 20, 1970 6/47 (13%) superself intense shadowy perceive table
– Seth Speaks: The Eternal Validity of the Soul
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Part One
– Chapter 7: The Potentials of the Soul
– Session 530, May 20, 1970, 9:19 P.M. Wednesday

[... 13 paragraphs ...]

Now: This is difficult to explain, and for our present purposes it is not entirely necessary that you understand the reasons for this pulsing; but even physically, you are “not here” as often as you are. Your emotional intensity and focus create forms beside your physical body, however their duration and degree are dependent upon the intensity of any given emotional origin.

[... 20 paragraphs ...]

Now: Let me make it clear once again: Your present personality as you think of it is indeed “indelible,” and continues after death to grow and develop.

I mention this again in the middle of our present discussion so that you do not feel lost, or negated, or insignificant. There are obviously an infinite number of gradations in the types and kinds of forms of which we have been speaking. That energy which is projected from our “superself,” that spark of intense identity that resulted in your physical birth, that unique impetus, in the one way has many similarities to the old concept of the soul — except that it contains only a part of the story.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

(11:05.) It does not desert the body for any length of time, however, and it is not this that is projected in cases like the seaside analogy used earlier. You are presently focused not only in your physical body, but within a particular frequency of events that you interpret as time. Other historical periods exist simultaneously, in forms quite as valid; and other reincarnational selves. Again, you simply are not tuned to those frequencies.

You can know what happened in the past and have histories, because according to the rules of the game that you accepted, you believe that the past, but not the future, can be perceived. You could have histories of the future in the present, if the rules of the game were different. Do you follow me?

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

There are then, obviously, probable futures and probable presents. I am trying to discuss this in your terms, since basically, you must understand, the words “past,” “present,” and “future” are no more meaningful as far as true experience is concerned than are the words “ego,” “conscious,” or “unconscious.”

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TPS6 Deleted Session May 5, 1981 panic superself dj poohed Sinful
UR1 Section 1: Session 687 March 4, 1974 probable neurological shadowy geese race
TPS6 Deleted Session April 15, 1981 Sinful superself dilemma breakthrough fulfillment
SS Part Two: Chapter 16: Session 566, February 15, 1971 probable violin selves bleed event