“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Learning is not simply passed on from living tissue to living tissue — this your biologists have discovered — but it is also passed on through the body’s present corporeal reality, sometimes entirely changing the messages to past cells, that in your terms no longer exist.

(10:20. “Seth was doing it slow so that I got it right,” Jane said. “The biologists won’t accept that, though…. Pretty tricky.” Resume in the same manner at 10:35.)

[...] Currently Jane and I are reading a book written by a biologist. [...]

(Nor is the biologist’s chaos the same thing as Seth’s “unpredictability.” [...]

A number of scientists — biologists, zoologists, and psychologists, among others — have recently published highly praised books in which they claim to show how our genes manipulate our individual behavior with only their own genetic survival at stake, even when we think we are displaying subjective qualities like altruism. [...]

[...] Even the biologists (and other scientists) who insist upon our mechanistic bases do so with feeling!

Even when social scientists or biologists explore human sexuality, they do so from the framework of sexuality as it appears in your world. [...]

Impulses possess a far different reality than physicists or biologists suppose. [...]

(As we waited for tonight’s session to begin I read to Jane a letter I’ve just written to a prominent biologist. [...]

[...] Ed Gassner offered to do work with Jane and Seth; he is a biologist, Ph.D.

(Seth’s ideas aside for the moment, biologists faithful to Darwin’s theories don’t want to hear anything about the precognitive abilities of a species, nor do they see any evidence of it in their work. [...]

Any biologist who is a true Darwinist would find these statements of Seth’s to be anathema: “Psychic and religious ideas, then, despite many drawbacks … are far more important in terms of ‘evolution’ than is recognized.” [...]