“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] It was because of distrust of this spontaneous self that he accepted your suggestions so readily and without argument. [...]

([Joel:]“I was thinking back to a few weeks ago when we were talking about a hypothetical case of two fellows having some kind of an argument with one another, and the other formulated a mental image of himself slugging his opponent. [...]

[...] There are, however, learned arguments in which professors debate such questions. [...]

[...] Billie was dominant over her father, Jerry said; she was very insistent and wouldn’t back down in an argument.

[...] After the party there seems to have been an argument between you and your husband—and something to do with a lamp. [...]

[...] Because that statement was couched as it was, it did not bring any arguments to your minds. [...]

[...] Because you did not accept your feelings, much less express them, on the next occasion you might explode seemingly without reason and initiate a spectacular argument, completely unjustified.

[...] Now that kind of a suggestion, automatically with Ruburt, brings up inner responses, arguments and contradictions with experience on a physical level. [...]

[...] If he did not use his abilities obviously he would make no errors, but this is hardly a good argument. [...]

[...] A tiff or argument with a colleague, pertaining to the interpretation of a particular passage in a book, or perhaps in a speech. [...]

[...] There was some kind of disagreement as to Bill’s choice of a career [Bill had left the Navy not long before], an argument with Bill’s father; ever after that Bill didn’t get along with his father. [...]

[...] The change of method involves argument over basic philosophies. [...]

(Jane and I almost had an argument over the setup, though, for I had mistakenly assumed that she’d be glad to see everyone at once and get it over with, so we’d be free the rest of the day. [...]

“But what’s the point of it, providing it was legitimate, just for the sake of argument?” I said. [...]

[...] If anything, it adds to my argument—for if those theories really held sway, one nation or another by now would have already destroyed your world. [...]

[...] Whether their beliefs are rooted in the tenets of conventional biology (Darwinism), for instance, or allied with those of the creationists (who hold that God made the earth and all of its creatures, just as described in the Book of Genesis), the advocates of rival theories have impressed me as having at least one thing in common: No matter how violently they may disagree, their arguments lack all sense of humor. [...]

[...] The arguments about evolution can get very technical, so in my notes I’m referring to those aspects of the subject in the barest terms possible.

[...] I’d rather approach that argument through another statement Seth made in Chapter 20 of Seth Speaks (in the 582nd session): “You are biologically connected, chemically connected with the Earth that you know….” [...]

“If you are willing to concede the point, then I have other arguments. [...]

[...] The feeling I had was that something had happened between Mary and her new husband, an argument. [...]

[...] The scandal at the time was the noisy and violent arguments of an Italian couple, Anna and Jimmy. [...]

[...] One girl, Lydia, was the most vocal of the group in her arguments against reincarnation.