“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Involved in the arguments are the leading cancer investigative organizations in the country. [...]

[...] If it could be shown that most of the “high risk” women would get cancer, there wouldn’t be arguments about whether such mastectomies are of general value. [...]

[...] (I ask the question aside from the old, still-extant arguments within philosophy, psychology, and religion over whether free will has ever existed—or does—in any context. [...]

[...] You believed them, and you did not examine them, except when you brought to the surface of your mind arguments that reinforced them. [...]

[...] At your particular focus of consciousness, no arguments will suffice to convince you otherwise, for you are everywhere presented with the physical evidence of “fact.” [...]

[...] This is for you, for the anticipated argument that you will think of. [...]

[...] I said Jane’s mother had been abandoned by her father, that her grandparents had also been separated through bitter argument, and that Jane herself had often been threatened with such a fate by her mother. [...]

[...] This is for you, for the anticipated argument that you will think of (to Florence). [...]

[...] It appears the argument over the medical disclaimer for Mass Events may be on the way to a solution. [...]

[...] See the essay for April 16: “The entire issue (of Jane’s living) had been going on for some time, and the argument—the argument being somewhat in the nature of a soul facing its own legislature, or perhaps standing as a jury before itself, setting its own case in a kind of private yet public psychic trial. [...]

[...] From childhood, the mind is trained to use its argumentative, separating qualities above all others. [...]

[...] Beside Ruburt’s “natural leaning” (in quotes) characteristic dislike of families then, there was the “outsiders” argument, and you were often put in the middle.

[...] Arguments between you for example would have been far healthier. [...]

Now if there are arguments at the table this real benefit is lessened. [...]

[...] The same characteristics go along with the identification—the refusal to argue, the fear of argument, of overt protest, and of silent protest; fasting as a method of protest.

Now Ruburt inhibited the negative emotions, so-called, first of all because of his own background—the fear of arguments, of hurting someone, as explained clearly in other sessions. [...]

[...] During the proceedings I felt that I was the deceased woman, reliving an argument she once had with her husband. [...] The argument was a violent one. [...]

[...] He would have had no unusual difficulty, however, in say, standing up for his own ideas—holding his own, so to speak, in any arguments or philosophies. [...]

[...] Any arguments would take place within an implied framework of definitions. [...]

Now, let us take for argument’s sake, a poor unintelligent flower in the middle of a garden. [...]

[...] The entire issue had been going on for some time, and the argument—the argument being somewhat in the nature of a soul facing its own legislature, or perhaps standing as a jury before itself, setting its own case in a kind of private yet public psychic trial. [...]

[...] This will be in the form of an argument, I believe, before several persons, though it could occur before many persons. [...]