“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(During argument sequence: surprised as anyone else at sudden pounding of hand [has been lacking in strength for some time—had no idea it could pound that hard]—did feel myself controlled by someone else; vivid, angry vital woman, engaged in an argument. I then stepped back, still retaining immediacy, reported—and purposefully became less involved. Note here I maintain more awareness than most mediums I believe—therefore necessity of learning how to protect myself, in such involvement. The break after 1st half hour served to encourage me, personally, that data was okay—before I continued. Greater involvement followed. Session in afternoon—café’s drawn but seen in through window gaps—

[...] A man, indirectly or directly, provoked the argument. [...] He may or may not have been present, but he was the cause of the argument.

[...] No one knew of the argument but the two women, and neither of them told anyone. [...]

(Jane knows nothing about any argument between Blanche and Anne. [...]

(Jerry was convinced by my actions in the argument sequence that I was Billie or controlled by her at that time. [...]

[...] Since Seth goes into something else shortly, I will note here that John Bradley and Bill Gallagher engaged in lively argument here the evening before this session, on the subject of war.)

[...] To refrain from argument while simultaneously and deliberately forcing thoughts or pictures of peace, represents a positive action. [...]

[...] Your own reasonable arguments there will help. [...] Bring up arguments for that side. [...]

Ready arguments for the other side have been taken for granted by him emotionally. [...]

A small cat, either involved in the argument, or caused the argument, or present during the argument. [...]

[...] (Pause.) There is an argument among adults, and a door slams. [...]

[...] And the argument—the argument being somewhat in the nature of a soul facing its own legislature, or perhaps standing as a jury before itself, setting its own case in a kind of private yet public psychic trial. [...]

[...] But they are not all asleep, and one overhears an argument.

[...] A disturbed afternoon, and an argument, and the strong impression, again, of a breakage.

[...] There were arguments, Lorraine said. [...]

[...] The basic principles of it will rest in our own sessions where those who are curious enough and gifted enough intellectually may find the arguments and reasons upon which it is built.

[...] There will be others, like Ruburt himself and like yourself, Joseph, who will be intrigued by those fuller developments and arguments given in the basic material. [...]

[...] In May the group recommended scientifically acceptable alternatives, but it now appears unlikely that either the company owning TMI or the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission will adopt any of them—and so the arguments continue. [...]

Following the accident at TMI, and aside from the great fears “generated” by it, a host of problems began accumulating for the nuclear power industry—involving everything from poor plant design (as Seth commented in the 914th session for Chapter 7 of Dreams), to enormous cost overruns and the fear of default on bond issues, shoddy construction and quality control, human and mechanical error, the disposal of radioactive waste, conflicts with antinuclear and environmental groups, arguments over evacuation plans at various nuclear-plant sites, a greatly expanded list of steps (numbering in the thousands) that the NRC is compiling for utilities to take in order to increase the safety of their plants, and even governmental concern over the possible manipulation and falsification of plant safety records. [...]

(But Bill overheard a serious argument)

A tiff or argument involving Philip, rather unexpected, that will seem to shift alliances, but in the overall will not. [...]

([John:] “Will I be involved—actually a party in the argument?"

[...] That is the usual argument. [...] In the same manner, say, the ideal is to protect human life, and in the pursuit of that ideal you give generations of various animals deadly diseases, and sacrifice their lives.³ Your justification may be that people have souls and animals do not, or that the quality of life is less in the animals, but regardless of those arguments this is fanaticism — and the quality of human life itself suffers as a result, for those who sacrifice any kind of life along the way lose some respect for all life, human life included. [...]

[...] For I consider that argument, that unresolved conflict, to be at the heart of her difficulties. I even agree that such an argument may well be successfully solved in other probabilities, and that in larger terms that’s an entirely acceptable way for things to work within nature’s larger scheme of things. [...]

If you want to clear up an argument, tell yourself that you will do so in the dream state. [...]

[...] You rail at them, railing at your parents’ arguments. [...]

[...] You had arguments and reconciliations. [...]

[...] Somehow I always managed to get the Indian into the argument so evidently I have forgiven all that they did to me until l saw Joel, and then it all came back.”

[...] “Having to do with an argument.” [...] This was not an argument, but Jane forcefully presented her idea to the effect that she and I were obligated not to clown around with effects in the psychic field. [...]

(Pause.) Having to do with an argument. [...]

There was not to be any argument given. [...]