“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] But she said when I didn’t answer she decided to let the session go. [...]

[...] I will then end the session, unless you have a question that you particularly want answered this evening. [...]

(This session is in answer to two highly creative pages Jane wrote between 7:30—9:00 PM this evening. [...]

[...] At one point Ruburt saw the ape still male, and then a portion of himself sitting at the library table, for in your position it is the animal instincts themselves that propel you to search for answers, to write books, to explore in your particular way. [...]

[...] I know you want an answer to your question—

—yet the question itself limits the answer I can give you. [...]

If you do have any on this evening’s material to you, then I will answer them at our next session. [...]

[...] Now does that answer your question? [...]

[...] Often answers were given to questions that literally have no meaning outside of your own system of reality.

[...] Seth answered these, then ended the session at 11:09 P.M.)

[...] The answer to past lives lies in a deeper level, however. [...]

(Patty: “That’s a nice answer.”

When you ask: “How are events formed?” you more or less expect an answer couched in those terms. The answer is not that simple. [...]

Now Van Over, in answer to your question, was telepathically aware of Bernard’s letter, and understood it. [...]

[...] In some respects therefore, there are no cut and dried answers. [...]

[...] Seth’s answer, above, contributed to the confusion, and is in error. [...] He discusses this particular building data and the inaccurate answer in a most interesting manner. [...]

[...] This is a reference to the fact that I have four paintings to show Dr. Lodico, in answer to his letter. [...]

[...] As well as answering the question in an oblique way, Seth appears to be still considering the geometric data. [...]

Now: I will answer your questions this evening—but rather than begin with them I would like to make some general comments about your own observation immediately before the session, and in a fairly neutral manner. [...]

[...] When he sold Avon he was hearing the questions that his own work would later try to answer. [...]

[...] The telephone rang, and at Seth’s urging I answered it. [...]

[...] It stands on a wooden pedestal; the polished reflections in it seem to move as one’s viewpoint changes. We believe this is the oval shape Seth refers to, in light of his answer to my second question.

[...] Seth gave this answer to my question in which I asked him to say more about the object itself. [...]

[...] Seth gave this in answer to my second question, and continues below. [...]

[...] “Boy, Seth, you better come up with some answers,” she said. [...]

The question, however brings up all of your attitudes—and you also have social attitudes—another apartment is no answer in that context. [...]

This evening for example, your after-dinner conversation aroused Ruburt’s own fears, sent him into an emotional state in which he accepted them, used them, exaggerated even his desperation, hoping to force an answer.

[...] If you do not trust yourself you may ignore such impetuses and not take advantage of the answers.

He is dealing with still-largely unknown phenomena, so that he has, of course, no pat answers to fall back upon. [...]

[...] Nor is he obligated to answer mail. [...]

(“So after all these years I find that out,” I answered. [...]

[...] [Checking later, I found that she’d given me the same answer about certain Seth material in Mass Events.]

[...] Frank Longwell cited a case whereby his brother Waldo obtained encouraging answers to a set of business problems that had been bugging the Longwells for some time. [...]

[...] It took me a while to realize that I had received an answer from Framework 2, and that for us it couldn’t have been better.

[...] The answer is up to you. [...]

[...] Intellectually known truths are the goal—truths almost like some exotic product to be attained by man, as man searches through science or religion for ultimate answers.

[...] I give you then my fondest regards, and please note that I answered your question. [...]

[...] Wendell’s letter of May 26 was in answer to a letter I wrote him last February. [...] Seth has more to say about February in answer to my first question.

[...] No generalizations can completely answer these questions however, for despite them individuals, regardless of their sex, will show great variations in the dream images that they recall or forget entirely.

[...] As explained, the object for tonight contained a letter written by Wendell Crowley in answer to my letter of last February. [...]

[...] He told us many things and answered—and asked—many questions. [...]

[...] I want to have the session,” I said in answer to her questions. [...]

[...] If you ask “Is the world a better place to live because I live?” or “Have I helped the people in the world in any way?” or “Have I lifted men’s hearts or minds in any way?” or “Have I affected others for the better?” then those answers must be yes, and there is no better measure of true success. [...]