“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Man’s experience (underlined) includes, for example, all kinds of behavior for which science has no answers. [...]

[...] The phone rings and at first I can’t tell if the ring is really here or from the radio, and when I answer the phone the voice is distant; it asks for Rob. [...]

[...] So he, as a joke on me, would tell you nothing at all, and answer hardly any of your questions.

[...] She then answered my thoughts in closing out the session.

Your beliefs close you off from much otherwise quite-available knowledge concerning man’s psychology—knowledge that would serve to answer many questions usually asked about the reasons for suffering. Other questions, it is true, are more difficult to answer. [...]

[...] I had a million questions, and felt almost totally frustrated trying to get answers. [...]

[...] Once again, a mindless resistance seemed to be the answer, at least from my standpoint. [...]

[...] I felt, and still do as this is written, that Seth gave only a partial answer to the original question, concerning the purposes and awarenesses of the inner self; I intend to press for a more complete answer.)

Time is basically meaningless so that the question cannot be answered in the framework in which you asked it. [...]

[...] And it has taken me some time to get the idea of probable realities to your heads, and I knew that someone at sometime would ask me about reincarnational selves and so I suppose it behooves me to try to give you an answer, and it is this. [...]

[...] I am answering in the affirmative. [...]

To do that, I have to drop those old feelings of responsibility as a primary focus (to get the ideas out quickly so they can help people, etc.) because those feelings strain the Seth-book framework particularly when I demand that in each book Seth answers all questions and so forth. [...]

[...] I now had at least one answer: Her body jumped in her chair, and her eyes popped open as though from shock. [...] Then she answered my query to the effect that she was all right.

[...] So when Ruburt asks such questions from the framework of old beliefs, with their old meanings, then he can find no adequate answers. [...]

(Pause.) In that regard, the questions of Ruburt’s “Sinful Self” must indeed seem to it most alarming, for it possesses no frame of reference in which its own questions can be answered. [...]

I am showing him (Ruburt) how to open and close doors, how to answer knocks without letting the whole world in. [...]

[...] These we attempted to answer. [...]

[...] Seth’s answer to my question was more than a little surprising and saddening to us, and opened up a number of insights:

[...] I would have preferred that you did not ask me this question, but since you did, and since you both loved the dog, it deserves an answer.”

(This afternoon Jane’s editor at Prentice-Hall, Tam Mossman, called her re the Seth book Jane is completing for P/H. Tam also had a couple of questions, which Seth begins to answer in this session.

[...] I have several things to say, and we will try to answer questions that you have in mind.

[...] No commitments have been made, and I’m anxious that Jane consider whether she even wants the interview, as well as the questions that would then arise, should she answer yes.

[...] And answer any questions that you might have.

[...] Yet even those serve as a stimulus to these sessions, and spur you to seek further answers. [...]

[...] A note: Seth gave an excellent answer to Jastrow’s kind of thinking two years ago in either chapter 7 or 8 of Psyche.

I should not answer that question. [...]

[...] A humorous repartee followed, with Seth answering our questions on a variety of subjects. [...]

[...] Your letters have an effect, whether or not it seems that any given questions are being answered.

[...] I answered Christmas cards for half an hour, then worked on Dreams.

The answer lies in understanding what I have said.

[...] Perhaps if Jane and I could do that, a great metamorphosis would take place: The closer we moved through probabilities toward All That Is, the more the tensions associated with the subject in question would transform themselves into profoundly joyous answers and challenges.

[...] The answer is that we’ve held 13 more sessions—4 of them given by Jane “herself,” and 9 by Seth speaking through her. [...]

[...] I work around these creative outpourings by ministering to my wife, running our house and the many errands connected with our daily living, handling our publishing affairs, seeing visitors—expected and unexpected—and trying to answer at least some of the mail, which is threatening to accumulate beyond control. [...]

[...] “I feared I’d lost all inspiration—that 20 years of answers weren’t enough, and that perhaps my life had no place to go if that were the case. [...]

(Long pause.) Beside this, he felt that such a performance would alter the direction his work would take in ways that would be detrimental overall, for the broadening quality of that kind of discourse could only be as extensive in scope as the quality of his audience’s understanding, so that the material might become too tailored to public need or consumption—tied up in answering conventional questions—an excellent point, by the way. [...]

[...] If you want to, note down any particular questions you want to ask—knowing of course that I will answer them in my own fashion. [...]