“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Playing the tape was an attempt to answer some of their questions, and in this Jane and I were following Seth’s advice of the 246th session. [...]

[...] A long break was taken after the first delivery; Jane’s voice was good, her points very emphatic, and her eyes wide open some of the time as she answered questions. [...]

[...] This is Day 15 of her new campaign, and I’d already reminded her of the question we wanted Seth to answer: Why had this fever and infection business erupted after Day 1?

[...] She later confirmed this — but she went back into trance and answered.)

Now I am glad that you have all had such a jolly evening, and in the table’s energy I hope that you saw a reflection of your own (to Ron), and I hope that you realize, not looking at anyone in particular, that a playful answer will be given and long faces will get you nowhere. [...]

(We would like to insert a note here to Roger, to the effect that we would like him to go over the two sessions and give us a detailed written summary of the data given through Jane, in answer to the mathematical questions he sent Jane. This applies whether the answers satisfy him, or make any kind of sense, or not. [...]

[...] Thus one of our questions was answered, if vaguely. [...]

[...] For tonight, then, I wanted a session with answers in it, so that we could try again in spite of past failures. [...]

Beneath all of the other issues and reasons at any given time, and perhaps the answer to your earlier voiced question, is the act that, more important than you realize, that for some time in vital areas you have not approved of yourselves. [...]

[...] I didn’t make the question clear enough, so Seth answered it in more immediate terms—which is also valuable information, of course, that we can act upon. [...]

[...] It was a question and answer affair for the most part. [...] I did not ask Seth the type of question I would prefer being answered in writing.

[...] Jane’s publisher F. Fell, has written asking for photographs pertaining to the Seth book; in connection with this and in answer to my question, Seth said he would be amused to see a reproduction of my painting, purporting to be Seth, in the book. [...]

(I asked no questions about other major topics, such as the envelope experiments, Dr. Instream, etc., preferring to have such answers in writing. [...]

[...] Questions would be raised in the minds of the readers, and in other books the various ideas could be expanded from the material, and these questions answered. [...]

[...] A note that was not answered. [...]

[...] The above data is developed further in two of the questions Seth answers later, and will be furnished then for convenience’s sake.

[...] A note that was not answered. [...]

(First Question: “Are you saying there are two objects in the envelope?” Answer: “Or represented on a single object.” [...]

[...] They are always given to specific answers... [...]

[...] The fluids represent bitterness that you will not let go of, and so you must tell yourself that your inner self possesses the answers—as it does—that it will guide you... [...]

[...] [In answer to Bill’s question.] “A close relative. [...]

[...] I will answer them to the best of my ability.

[...] You are wishing for many answers from me, and I have always felt the pull of your inquiries. However at the same time you do set up these blocks; for you are not afraid of the answers, but you are afraid basically that they could be given in this manner.

[...] It is not that I could not reach you through Ruburt, and answer some of your questions. In any case it is simply that the answers would do you no good under such circumstances.

[...] You may request information concerning abilities for example, and hear your answer internally. [...]

I am going to give you a brief session, but if you have any questions I will answer them.

[...] After an average-length break an unrecorded interval of material followed, with Seth mainly answering questions for Carl. [...]

[...] The phone should not be answered, however. [...]

[...] It responds to an inborn impetus for its own greatest fulfillment, and will automatically change directions in answer to its own experiments and experiences. [...]

1. Seth is letting his material automatically answer my question about early man; See Appendix 6, as well as Note 7 for Session 688. According to our dictionary, the geologic time span he indicates in tonight’s session falls within the Tertiary Period of the Cenozoic Era. [...]

[...] Why couldn’t he cure her, or at least help her?” My answer right here is that those questions were and still are answered to the best of the abilities of Jane, Seth, and myself in these private sessions, even while I keep in mind Frank Watts’s references to Jane’s “Timidity has roots of rage.” [...] Part of the answer, as I’ve already noted, is that because of her strong fears from early childhood on, Jane did not allow Seth to tell us all he could have. [...]

[...] Sometimes I think I’m a slow learner: It took me a while to realize, for example, that the responses to the Seth material by mail and in person—and now electronically—are actually myriad extensions of that work, showing in all of their varieties the questions and answers it’s raised and the beneficial effects it’s had on the many who have communicated since Jane held her first real session on December 2, 1963—and on those who still do. [...] Seldom does a day go by that I don’t answer letters. [...]

[...] Not that we would have received any answers! [...] Why didn’t we push him for more specific answers? [...]

[...] I usually spent the morning typing the session she had delivered the afternoon before for The Way Toward Health, answering mail, running, and running errands. [...] I still remember asking myself as I trotted along on my 65th birthday on June 20: “Should I still be doing this?” My answer was yes, for that action, free of any other personal responsibility, helped me stay connected with the outside world in my own way. [...]

(I gave this answer almost as a matter of routine. [...] Jane’s hesitancy here reminds me of her hesitancy in the beginning sessions, when it early became apparent that she was receiving the answers to questions mentally, even though we were using the Ouija board. [...]

[...] She heard her voice however, and my answers. [...]

(Jane had suspected the above would be Seth’s answer, and had told me so over the weekend. [...] However, the character of the answers we had been receiving for some little while before this point had been reached, had changed from the type of answer Frank Watts had been giving; I recall that even then we had wondered whether some other entity than Frank Watts had become involved.

(9:52.) I will give the beginning of an answer (to my question about the relationship between the host organism and disease). [...] That should be your complete answer (with humor), but obviously it is not.

[...] “All those things I’m supposed to answer…. [...]

[...] You wonder what gave life to the first egg or seed, or whatever, and think that an answer to that question would answer most others; for life, you say, was simply passed on from that point.

(The scientist in question may never answer my letter, but it’s already had one unexpected beneficial effect: Tonight, after he finished book dictation, Seth gave an excellent summation of his own version of what our species like to call evolution. [...]

[...] Sally asked me a direct question, and I couldn’t answer.) Here everyone in the room with the exception of Theodore who was in a poor position, reported the following:

Watching the hand in transition, changes apparent as they happened, joints and knuckles becoming very thick and large, flesh seeming to disappear so that hand became thinner otherwise,hand taking on the look of a very old woman’s, exceedingly bony, with the large, they said, exceptionally large, joints obvious; Rose frightened; Sally said the hand looked so stiff that it was here she asked me if I could bend the fingers, it was here I couldn’t answer her but did try to bend the hand; and at this point decided to give myself suggestions to come out of trance and for hand to return to normal. [...]

[...] As I started to answer Seth broke in:)

Now—let me answer that one, and give a living example, a recent one.

[...] A written note, with an appeal for an answer, or implied request.

[...] But in answer to the second question, Seth cites Jane’s difficulty, and the thought of my mother, her cousin Vivian, and Vivian’s husband Bill. [...]

(“A written note, with an appeal for an answer, or implied request.” [...]

[...] Bill refers to any problems in his letter, how to get in touch with him, etc., and implies that I answer it. [...]