“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

I am not saying that words cannot be used to describe the psyche, but they cannot define it. [...]

In those terms, I am outside of your “frame” of reference. [...]

[...] In a manner of speaking, Seth Two’s reality includes my own, yet I am aware of my contribution to “his” experience.

[...] Ruburt is contributing and forming a certain portion of my experience, even as I am contributing to his. [...]

[...] If you are intuitively aware of that miraculous neatness, if you allow yourself to be enveloped within that particular moment point, then the painting will form itself about you in somewhat the same manner that I am formed about Ruburt’s voice. [...]

(I am not an expert on Spanish art, but the above passage reminds me of Velazquez for some reason. [...]

[...] Now this is the expansion of which I am speaking. [...]

Now, some of my suggestions for you this evening come from better sources than I. For as you know I am no artist.

I am not implying that the father consciously intends either unkindness nor revenge, any more than I am implying that Ruburt intended unkindness or revenge on Walter Zeh; yet was this not the result, and is it not the result here?

Nevertheless I do here welcome all present, and hope that I am myself welcomed, into what we may call a pleasant family gathering.

[...] Nevertheless, I did feel a legitimate welcome in advance; and since I feel already as if I know very well two of the present gathering, and since furthermore we have dealt with them in our material, I am more than willing to greet both of them personally.

[...] And yet through living at home while helping the father, on the one hand, in the establishment, at the same time on unconscious levels by his very presence he says “I am not doing what I want to do, and you are to blame.”

[...] I am not referring here to you specifically, Joseph, any more than I am to any reader or class member.

[...] Yet Seth’s simultaneous time isn’t an absolute, for, as he also told us in that session: “While I am not affected by time on your plane, I am affected by something resembling time on my plane … To me time can be manipulated, used at leisure and examined. [...]

Now: I am not saying that the human personality is “as significant as a cell — no more and no less.”

I am saying that in a way the people alive on the body of the earth have the same kind of relationship, one to another, as the cells have one to the other.

[...] Please wait until I am finished with spontaneous impressions for your questions, and then I will try to answer them.

[...] I am not sure. [...]

[...] The left…I am searching here… ventri… ventric…

[...] I am not certain, a female child. [...]

Pretend for a moment that you are a child, and I am trying to undertake the particular chore of explaining to you what your most developed, adult self will be like — and in my explanation, I say that this adult self is to some extent already a part of you, an outgrowth or projection of what you are. [...] How can I ever be this adult self when it is not what I am now, without dying as what I am?”

I am in somewhat the same position when I try to explain to you the nature of this inner self, for while you can become aware of it in dreams, you cannot truly appreciate its maturity or abilities; yet they are yours in the same way that the man’s abilities belonged to the child. [...]

[...] The Crossons stayed until about 1:30 AM.

[...] I cannot stress the importance of the suggestions I am giving this evening. [...]

He can think along these lines for example: “Of course I am healthy. [...]

[...] I am a good Sethite, as Ruburt would say. [...]

What I am telling you has been told throughout the centuries and the people have not listened. [...]

I am of course pleased about Ruburt’s letter. As I mentioned earlier I am extremely leery about trying to get predictions through to you, and therefore at this point I do not try. [...]

[...] You cannot say that I am unwilling to make concessions, though I must admit that five minutes is my limit.

[...] I am even, and this is quite unusual for me, hesitant at bringing him to discipline here, since he is usually so concerned about subconscious distortion that I do not want to imprint the suggestion in his mind.

I am quite certain, Joseph, that for once Ruburt does not appreciate your humorous remarks made during break. [...]

[...] I am speaking through Fred Conyers, who flew all the way here from Denver just to see you and Jane. [...]

[...] I am Seth. [...]

[...] “I know you don’t believe me, Robert, but I am Seth. [...]

[...] I am Seth; I know he’ll be all right.” [...]

I am shortly going to end our session, but I have a word for our dean(Theodore), over there behind the vine. [...]

(To Kyle.) Now, our friend here is pleased with his new joy and I am glad for him. [...]

[...] Is that the crossroads I am at now? [...]

(To Rachel.) I will not mention journeys that certain people do not remember, over here, lest it seem that I am reprimanding them, and far be it from my intent. [...]

[...] I go out of my way, as your friend Seth II does not, to show you that I am a jolly fellow. [...]

[...] I am taking a break. [...]

[...] When you are learning to walk or swim you do not stop to think, “How am I doing this, will I meet a mean old fish or not, will I pull?” and you do not imagine the dire consequences that may, therefore, attend you and do not do so now. [...]

([Joel:] “Is he picking up grades of distortion in my subconscious because I am trying to prove something?”)

[...] I am not here saying that unpleasant stimuli will not be felt as unpleasant, and reacted against, by less self-conscious organisms. I am saying that less self-conscious organisms will rejoice even in their automatic reaction against such stimuli, because any stimuli and reaction represents sensation, and sensation is another method by which such action knows and expresses itself.

[...] I am not here saying that all illness is good. I am saying that illness is a portion of the action of which any personality is composed, and therefore it is purposeful, and cannot be considered as an alien force that attacks the personality from without.

[...] It is not just symbolically accepted, and I am not speaking in symbolic terms. [...]

[...] The matter was in your mind, and I am giving you a simple and direct answer.

[...] However, very little work, if any, is being carried on along the lines I am about to suggest.

[...] I am sure you realize the difference between these, but basically such dreams are the same. [...]

You see, I am giving you good breaks this evening.

Through him I am aware of the nature and condition of your world, and offer from my viewpoint comments meant to help you. Through Ruburt, then, I am permitted to view the earth “again” in your terms. [...]

“You believe that you cannot speak to me unless I have a name, so I am Seth … I told Ruburt from our earliest sessions that he could call me Seth. I never said, ‘My name is Seth,’ (but ‘I call myself Seth’ — my emphasis), for I am nameless. [...]

When our Wilford dramatically cries out to his mistress: “I am afraid my wife will learn of our affair,” then the symphony playing on another station becomes melodramatic, and the sports program shows that a hero fumbles the football. [...]

[...] In a manner of speaking, I am one personality and one program or station. [...]

I am aware of the various egotistical selves that I have been. I am still each of these selves, but the whole self that I am is dominant now. [...] For I am aware of all my selves.

[...] I am not tied to physical existence by any strong emotional bonds however, and my personality structure is more advanced than is usual for communicators from other systems.

I am a communicator. [...]

[...] Indeed I am with you more than you know, and I am never really far from you.

I am not, as you know, particularly in favor of physical effects, but since Ruburt is such a well-known doubter I will go along. [...]

[...] Joseph does not have his house, but I think that I am perfectly capable of producing as good effects here as I promised you at the housewarming.

(November 2, Monday, 11:30 AM: Feeling of vibration, body and bed, maybe three minutes duration. [...]

[...] I am not concerned about our book, the latest one. I am intent, however, about a new beginning, a new dedication, so that your own purposes become clearer, and your abilities better used. [...]

[...] There are periods of balance, where for example—and I am using analogies, understand me—you may find a product, a person at a certain balance point, pleased with all aspects of life, in good health, well-off financially, and meeting goals. [...]

[...] Through the years the goals of one level of consciousness— though I am putting this simply—became tied to the goals of another level of consciousness. [...]

I am not, as you should know, saying that the goal of financial success is a low one. [...]

And I am speaking in order to regenerate Ruburt’s own energy. [...]

[...] But I am indeed present and approachable. [...]

— and I am announcing myself again in order to quicken those coordinates that quicken the healing processes.

Now, I may nor may not return, again according to those rhythms of which I speak — but know that I am present and approachable.