“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] One thing does not depend upon the other in what I am about to say.

[...] This is what I am trying to tell you.

Perhaps two windows also on the south side; though I am not sure these are windows on the south side, but window shapes in any case. [...]

[...] I am digressing here to bring you another issue: the strong responsibility he always felt toward his writing ability, he naturally felt toward the psychic ability—but without the necessary sense of discrimination, since he didn’t realize what such activities involved.

[...] I am trying to bring you up to date consecutively, and interwind all events so that you can follow. [...]

[...] While I am engrossed in this particular subject I will therefore continue with it. [...]

We will not go deeply into the sensations this evening, mainly because I am thinking of you, and do not wish to take up more than my share of your time.

I am not agreeing here, necessarily, but stating his reaction. [...]

And later, with much humor: “I am willing to have longer sessions for as long as you put up with me. [...]

I am not speaking of course of you or Ruburt alone, but of everyone.

[...] Am I?”

[...] I am not asking you to relate to the word life, but to life itself and to do this you must experience the life within yourself and feel it. [...]

[...] As a preliminary to the methods I will give later, it is a good idea to ask yourself now and then: “What am I actually conscious of at this time?” Do this when your eyes open, and again when they are closed.

[...] For example “Am I afraid of the implications in this letter?” and then, according to the reply and circumstances, Ruburt answers the correspondent in a particular fashion, states his feelings, or does not answer at all.

[...] Now I am much more interested in how precognition works, what triggers it and what translates into dream experience.

Next I am standing on spacious, landscaped grounds with gravel paths neatly laid out, divided by trees and shrubs. [...]

(Smile:) I am quite aware of the distorted religious connections made here: Die to yourself and you will be reborn; you will not kill yourself. [...]

(Long pause.) I am aware that many psychologists and psychiatrists feel that they are charting the course of the psyche with these methods. [...]

Seth is what I am, and yet I am more than Seth is. Seth is, however, independent, and continues to develop as I do … Simply as an analogy, and only as an analogy, I am what you would refer to as a future Seth, as Seth in a “higher” stage of development. [...]

[...] If it were tied to money-making, as it once was, then painting became also power-making, and hence acceptable to your American malehood; and I am quite aware of the fact that both of you were, by the standards of your times, quite liberal, more the pity. [...]

[...] If you ask, “What is my individuality in all of this?” or, “Which ‘I’ am I?” then you are automatically thinking of yourself as a psychological entity with definite boundaries that must be protected at all costs. [...]

(While trying psychological time on January 18, Monday, 11:30 AM, Jane achieved the following results: “Extreme feeling of weightlessness. [...]

[...] I am working from the other end, you see.

[...] I am certain that you know in what areas of your lives this material might be useful. [...]

[...] So unless there is another identical (underlined) Ruburt and Joseph combination, I am stuck with you. [...]