“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] And here the use of energy for this purpose is conscious, that is the strong hidden self actually makes use of the camouflage conscious self and molds the two into a reality that combines two planes. [...]

[...] The subconscious is the link between these two self-consciousnesses, and here you find an acceptance by the camouflage personality of the materials at hand.

[...] In your dual system, that is, the two self-consciousnesses are more divided and alien to themselves than need be. [...]

(4:14 p.m. Jane took the Darvoset — which she’s getting every two hours or so. [...]

[...] The question comes in two parts and so I shall expect it to be answered in two parts. [...]

(Since September 30 Seth has held two ESP class sessions; held a session for our friend John Barclay, who is moving to Nevada; held two sessions concerning the work Jane and I are embarking upon because of this material; and spoken through Jane upon television once more — this time during our return visit to a Washington, D.C. station.

(The movie is The China Syndrome, of course, with Michael Douglas, Jack Lemmon and Jane Fonda, which opened to rave reviews perhaps two weeks or so ago. [...]

[...] It could hardly be a coincidence, I remarked to Jane this noon that both mass events had taken place this year, and represented the two poles, or extremes, of mankind’s present belief systems: religion and science. [...]

[...] Man has always considered himself, in your terms, as set apart from nature, so he must feel set apart from nature’s power—and there must be a great division in his dreams between the two. [...]

[...] There’s no need to go into all the complicated details here; it’s enough to say that the photos Bantam used in Seth Speaks were involved, especially the cover shot of Jane; as well as bids for Oversoul Seven between Pocket Books and Bantam; Jane’s fears that she’d end up committed for two more Seven books she hasn’t written yet; and various misunderstandings concerning ethics, expired option, and an offer to Jane to go to work for Simon & Schuster-Pocket Books, and to take Tam with her.

(Perhaps we should be flattered that the last we heard of the bidding saw Bantam making an offer to Prentice of $50,000 for the present Seven, plus the next two.... [...]

The longed-for definite improvement in walking is about two weeks away, involving agility particularly. [...]

[...] If he does not have his teeth out, he will probably lose two more that are very loose—but not for one or two years. [...]

(I also asked that Seth comment on Jane’s teeth, and on the “bug,” or whatever, that I’d been really bothered by for the last two weeks. [...]

[...] The voice that I can use on occasion could shatter the small image through which I speak and the spirit that belongs to your parents could not be contained in one bodily form or two. [...]

(To Ned and Sue.) Now, you two are doing very well. [...]

([Arnold:] “If we were two-dimensional and were one of a stack of cards placed in the middle of the deck, we would not be aware of those above and below, but if we could pull ourselves out of the stack we would be able to see that which was above and below?”)

[...] When it seemed you would not police the two of you with the intense fervor necessary, I began to do so, and took upon myself all those attitudes that had been yours. [...]

You two more or less made me a promise that Ruburt would begin working sensibly on his book again (after last session), and instead you took a trip. [...]

[...] Jane felt so limp and relaxed, I told her, that it seemed she had shed two tons of weight. [...]

[...] Unknowingly you were working on the two levels given in my last session, through suggestion, building self-confidence while Ruburt wrote out his gripes and conscious thoughts. [...]

In two days Ruburt has become more aware of his problems consciously, and made connections that had (underlined) to be made. [...]

Now you two are in the clear, with the basic dilemma out, being acted upon, worked through and faced; but the habits must also be combated by Ruburt writing out those thoughts and feelings daily. [...]

(Before the session I read Jane two questions that I asked Seth to consider: 1. Why is she still losing weight? [...]

[...] The resistances are two. [...]

I will end the session, but I will have more, providing you two follow through. [...]

[...] Streets — without sidewalks — passed the hill house on but two sides, at the southwest corner, and each one dead-ended less than a block away. [...]

[...] I’m inserting the material here to continue the record of our house hunting in an orderly way, and to show how even an important perception [in this case of a house] can at first make hardly any conscious impression upon the perceiver — although here two perceivers, Jane and I, were involved.

[...] For a couple of pages of notes he discussed the house we’d looked at on Foster Avenue two days ago. [...]

[...] So as counterpoint to her writings on the sinful self, I’ll be presenting two excerpts to hint at what Seth does mean by his magical approach.

[...] Right here I’m dealing with just two of Seth’s larger concepts. [...]

[...] Hook up those two factors with the quite natural concern that at least some events in any life to come will inevitably be unpleasant, or worse, and we have at least three powerful restraints, or psychic blocks, inhibiting awareness of future lives. [...]

[...] In a way, and in those terms, this also applies in Jane’s case when she contacts Seth, even on the “psychological bridge” those two have constructed between them: When Seth tells us that his last physical life was in Denmark in the 1600s, then Jane and I represent future physical selves of his. [...]

(Jane did very well reading aloud the first two notes I’d written for Session 907 of Dreams, as well as yesterday’s session. [...]

[...] I’d written two poems on the idea, and the day after the starlings were killed, I did another:

[...] She was so persuasive that the first two times this happened, I wondered if she was getting threatening mail, as unlikely as this seemed. [...]

[...] The neighborhood was middle-class, the house gray-framed, two-storied, with a front porch.

[...] So I never made any connection at first between the two experiences. [...]

(We skipped last week’s two regularly scheduled sessions so that Jane could rest, and so we’d have more time to spend house hunting. [...]

[...] The similarities in the two names are legitimate, I think. [...]

[...] You have already noticed a similarity in the two houses thus far that have attracted your attention.

[...] (With emphasis:) It would take a book to probe into the probabilities alone being roused at this time, for example, by all of those interested in either of those two houses.

[...] You feel that you must be successful or he will punish you, that you must be perfect; therefore you become panic stricken at any sense of failure within you, and you overexaggerate your failings so that you came here tonight to me as if you were two and a half years old. [...]

[...] You have no chance in a thousand lives of having a relationship with the man you think of as being Dick Reed, because you cannot have a two-way relationship with an image that is one-sided and has no flesh. [...]

[...] As long as you allow this image to cover your eyes, you do not see the individual man and do not react to him for the image is between the two of you. [...]

Now, ordinary adult responsibilities, you see, would take him away from these two individuals and so he has taken steps to see that he is not involved. [...]

[...] It is true that the experiences you encounter may not be encountered by another in precisely (underline precisely) the same way, but physical experience is never the same for any two given individuals either.

Two: All objects have their origin basically in mental action. [...]

[...] Part of your accomplishment lies in our sessions and your own considerable work with the notes, and with the invisible aura contained in those notes, for there in a different way you are painting a portrait—a portrait of two lives from a highly individualistic standpoint, extremely unique—and that is the kind of experience that would be ripped out of your life’s fabric, were you the hypothetical idealized version with whom you sometimes relate—a version highly romanticized, let me add. [...]

This will be a brief session, and unless you have other comments I will try to answer two or three of your questions at a time in the sessions immediately following. [...]

[...] They are two different kinds of things, but you would sense the different kind of thing. [...]

[...] Do one of two things if there are distractions. [...]