“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] (Perhaps two years ago.) Hence the name, popping up the other evening. [...]

Two accidents were involved then, hence the confusion. [...]

(The call was from Callista Buffalin, a widow now in her late twenties, who had lived in our apartment house until about two years ago. [...]

[...] Because of the similarity of names Ruburt fused the two accidents into one in his perceptive experience.

“It is as if there were two portions of a bridge, like a drawbridge, and these two portions must meet. [...]

Seth Two said that certain portions of my personality acted as transparent windows into these other realities and consciousnesses. [...] Seth Two may have evolved almost beyond our understanding. [...]

[...] Seth could still be a part of an ancient entity, and Seth Two another portion more evolved in our terms. [...]

[...] On that particular evening, our 446th session, the other personality, Seth Two, came through in that distant clear voice.

[...] (Pause.) You still —and I do not simply mean you two alone—do not feel the unsurpassable force that thoughts have. [...] To brood or worry, or become resentful, is as regrettable as it would be if you, say, painted a big X over one of your paintings because you were dissatisfied with a detail or two. [...]

[...] We’d celebrated Thanksgiving last Thursday with our first turkey in two years.

I have one other point to mention, apropos: our session regarding the two men (see the deleted session, for me, of April 18, 1979). [...]

[...] I reread daily many of the private sessions he’s given for us in the last year or two—especially those in Book 20. [...]

(We would like to insert a note here to Roger, to the effect that we would like him to go over the two sessions and give us a detailed written summary of the data given through Jane, in answer to the mathematical questions he sent Jane. [...] Jane’s mathematical knowledge and vocabulary [and mine] is so limited that any valid [or invalid?] data obtained in trance by Jane, on this subject, is of interest to us; the more we learn about these two sessions, the easier it will be for us to interpret another facet of trance experience.

[...] Carl studied math for two years in college; reading the first session, he said that the ideas presented by Jane in trance made sense to him; he cited some examples to us and worked out some figures, especially concerning quadrants, and drew some diagrams. [...]

[...] The unshaken zero, gobbles two 7’s (pause), and structure or form is eaten away from the inside.

[...] This guy’s name was removed from the following two editions of the encyclopedia as a result... [...]

([The Gallaghers:] “In one antique shop, I [Peg] pointed out two antique crocks which were very much like two we have and like.”)

[...] I called the two people whose phone numbers were on their checks — one of them had donated $1000. [...]

(Then, while she was still eating, two lab technicians came in to take more blood from Jane — this was for a culture that would be grown for a week, they said. [...]

[...] No sooner did we find that out than one of the two aides returned to take more blood — they “want all they can get,” Jane swore. [...]

(Jane felt much better the last two days, etc.)

[...] The two blended. [...]

In the main however he felt he did not live up to your expectations, that the two of you were not together emotionally.

[...] The two of you were in one room together, where Ruburt felt his imperfections could not be hidden.

(Sunday, August 22nd, Jane discovered the tape recording of the first two Father Trainor episodes was deteriorating, for unknown reasons. Last evening she tried a rereading of the two poems involved, but stopped before getting through G. K. Chesterton’s Lepanto. [...]

[...] I also have the impression of black, and two people.

[...] I think now of a border of flowers, and of the two people, a man and a woman, and J. B. I think also of hills.

[...] The two people involved, a man and woman, could be Jane, and me who took the picture. [...]

Therefore I cannot tell you in advance of any such demonstrations, and in the case of my advice to Philip the slight demonstration of what you would call, I suppose, clairvoyant knowledge had two purposes.

[...] We also rather thought two participants were necessary to get good results with the cards.”)

For purposes of sending records to Duke you may be best covered by using two, an operator and a subject. [...]

[...] You are the apples of my eye, you two.

We did wonder at the two reactions, following the use of the two medications. [...]

Now: Your documentary rather neatly shows two portions of the world’s mind operating at odds, rather than in complementary ways—almost as if they were surgically separated, or somehow functionally impaired, as in many ways they have been through misunderstandings throughout the years. [...]

[...] In either case, you end up with the need for negotiators, who attempt to bring the two sides into at least some alignment, or to correct the vision and perception of each side until the situation of the other side is at least perceived with some clarity. [...]

(9:37.) Over a period of time you ended up with two exaggerated postures —artificial ones—with the spontaneous elements of the personality straining for the full use of their abilities (in parentheses: value fulfillment), and the reasoning one determined to pursue such endeavors—but with caution. [...]

(Long pause at 9:55.) Because the two of you are so involved, your own position is bound to change, and in years previous—to some extent, now—you also felt that certain portions of Ruburt’s personality should indeed be held in protective custody. [...]

[...] Two men will be fairly reasonable. [...]

[...] Two men, somewhat younger than the stout man. [...]

[...] An attempt to minimize or steer away from a main issue here, on the part of two gentlemen, who seem to offer instead a grab bag of tricks. [...]

[...] Approximately two months before the main crisis.

[...] There is no crime to be punished, but between those last two statements lies a world of understanding, and knowledge that must be attained. And punishment enters in between those two statements as the individual takes the consequence for the action and the intent.

[...] Between those two statements again lies worlds that must be deciphered.

[...] Value fulfillment is always working, yet there is between those two statements—you realize the ones to which I refer—the idea of judgment as an impetus and spur against the inner self’s knowledge of the growth that must come.

[...] I suggest that the regular portion of the session be read in conjunction with what follows, for the two parts complement each other well. [...]

(For the past few days I’ve done little “creative” work, beyond working on my watercolor portrait of Mrs. Johnson, the subject of my dream of last November, for an hour or two in the mornings; then in the afternoons I’ve typed these sessions and written the required notes for the record. [...]

[...] Do not be so afraid, neither of you, of making mistakes, or spending a bad evening or two.

[...] Prentice-Hall authorized this venture by a foreign publisher well over a year ago, but we didn’t know just when we’d see books within the two-year limit set for publication. [...]

[...] We hope these two editions will lead to the publication of Seth’s material in other languages.

[...] This afternoon Jane reread the letter, and wondered if Seth might give more material in reply; as she worked on Heroics she did get a line or two from Seth, commenting on that possibility. [...]

(In the 135th session, Seth gave me a little puzzle involving a Saturday evening and the number 5. Since then I have noted two occasions where the two conditions might apply. [...]

As for you, Joseph, within two weeks you will have completely recovered from the effects of your recent illness.

[...] The possibilities for action vary, however, within these two fields as they vary within all other fields. [...]

I will have more to say concerning the connection between the two fields and their manifestation in action, for one of the closest glimpses you can get of pure action is action as it is involved within the dream universe, and in this mobility as the personality passes into and out of the dream field. [...]

(On Monday, November 4, I mailed to Jane’s publisher all of the art due for her Adventures in Consciousness: An Introduction to Aspect Psychology: the 16 diagrams I’d just finished, plus two older pieces of work. [...]

(Before what we expected to be our regular session for Monday evening, Jane told me that she’d awakened in the middle of the previous night with insights about two practice elements¹ Seth would discuss — but we didn’t hear from Seth even though she felt him “around” as we prepared for the session.

[...] She’d already done some writing yesterday, for Psychic Politics, leading toward this view⁵; so whatever we learned through Seth this evening, we already felt reasonably sure that in usual trite terms Jane hadn’t been communicating directly with two such famous personalities. [...]

[...] Two months later, in May, she produced the summary for The Wonderworks, which would be a shorter dissertation on her own dreams, Seth, and the dream-formation of the universe as we know it. [...]

Now: I want to begin by mentioning one of the most important and vital messages in your glass-door dream (of two days ago),¹for its truth applies to the magical approach as well.

[...] To some degree historically speaking, that sort of situation operated in the past when — comparatively speaking, now — people realized that there was indeed an inner world of complexity and richness that could be approached in certain fashions, one that existed alongside with the physical world, so that the two intersected. [...]

[...] You were being shown — or showing yourself — the difference in the rules or assumptions between the two. [...]

[...] (with emphasis) is instead implied, and that entire reorientation will effortlessly bring about a new relationship of Ruburt with his body, with his life, and with the adventure the two of you have embarked upon. [...]

[...] The sound penetrated the two closed doors between Jane’s study and the living room, where we were. [...]

[...] After break Seth delivered two pages of data for Jane and me, and the session ended at 11:01 p.m.)

(In the 75th session, July 29, 1964, page 273, Seth stated regarding Bill: “Your friend has made two friends, one older and one approximately his own age. [...] There are two houses nearby, and a front room across from a beach. [...]

(Bill did make two friends, one older, and one about his own age. [...] Bill knew Gary for about two weeks, and O’Toole for about six weeks. [...]

(Bill states it is his belief that the “two houses nearby” do refer to the two cottages mentioned above, one shared by Gary and Larry O’Toole, with the front room across from the beach, since they are not far down the street from the A-House bar.

[...] Attending the party were Bill, Gary, Larry, and two other men Bill did not know. [...]