“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Within this framework you also gave yourself the freedom to manipulate and change. [...]

Something in the nature of a fabric with a wooden framework I believe, for our object. [...] The framework is used for support. [...]

[...] Such inner data continually and automatically is accepted by every other portion of the human framework except by the outer ego. [...]

[...] The main issue, again, is to reassure that one important portion of Ruburt’s personality that the self is not sinful, not bad or evil, and to show it the limited nature of the framework that so defined it. [...]

[...] It does mean that his overall identity will not stand for a protracted period when concentration is not primarily focused within this work framework.

[...] The framework of all systems is basically infinite. [...]

[...] Currently these include topics like Jonestown, Iran, Frameworks 1 and 2—and one I initiated earlier this year about human reproduction, called “the community of sperm.” [...]

When he gains confidence this will not be necessary and the hours should be used as a framework. [...]

[...] You should also remember that each person is also immersed in Framework 2. The good intent and the creativity that individuals may at times be unable to express adequately, still exists and enriches the psychological atmosphere.

[...] Within its framework lie the secrets of creativity, and within the secrets of creativity lie the secrets of being.

[...] Then she had an interesting comment as we made ready for bed; it pertained to the question I’d asked Seth about counterparts in families: “I think that maybe the family unit is designed more to take care of the reincarnational framework, instead of dealing so much with counterparts.” [...]

(Jane and I consider Seth’s concept of counterparts to be an intriguing psychological framework, spacious enough to serve as a workable thematic structure in which the social and nationalistic characteristics of our species can be studied, as well as the components of the individual psyche. [...]

[...] Along with his addition of simultaneous time, I’d say that the concept of counterparts provides reincarnation with a novel approach indeed; and that our awareness of both has always been latent within the reincarnational framework, whether in simultaneous or linear terms.

The entire Sinful-Self syndrome should remind him of his own personal background, so that he can see the growth of his personality, for in the large he has of course grown out of that framework. [...]

It is important to remember the benign unpredictability of Framework 2 in that regard, so that you leave the doors open for desired results in whatever way they might occur. [...]

I repeat: some of this can be conscious, if you use a psychological-time framework. [...]

The Framework 2 material provided Ruburt momentarily with enough faith to show some physical improvement. [...]

[...] At least you would be perfecting what you have, and taking steps within that framework, freely redecorating creatively, changing your environment instead of squawking while staying. [...]

I am not saying that the personality will then become static, obviously, but the basic psychological framework will be such to allow the fullest development.

[...] But within its framework you are also meant to grow and develop, and to extend the limits of your consciousness. [...]

Basically the species is relatively so freewheeling, with so many potentials, that it is necessary that the mother’s beliefs provide a kind of framework in the beginning, allowing the child to focus its abilities in desired directions. [...]

[...] The suggestion was far from a bit of fluff, however, for it could serve — and it did — as a framework about which new beliefs could rally.