“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] I realize that the material is no new bible, believe me. [...]

To that extent, the Bible’s interpretation is correct. [...]

4. Martin Luther, the German theologian and translator of the Bible, lived from 1483 to 1546. [...]

[...] An old bible in which family records may be kept. [...]

[...] Fundamental interpretations of the Bible often lead to such conclusions, so that the pursuit of knowledge itself, which has a built-in biological impetus, becomes a taboo activity.

[...] Bibles were illustrated with woodcuts in the late 15th century. [...]

There are many later-appended references in the Bible, such as the fig tree story, in which nature is played down. [...]

In some respects the overenthusiastic use of the sound was responsible for the flood mentioned in the Bible, and other literature. [...]

It is easy to see that you have no knowledge of the Bible —

[...] In the Bible, see Daniel 7:13, Matthew 24, and so forth.

(Many creationists believe that the Bible is literally true. [An undetermined number of scientists hold creationist views, by the way, but I have no statistics to offer on how many do.] The Bible certainly advocates at least a relative immutability of species, rather than a common ancestry in which a single cell evolved into a variety of ever more complex and divergent forms. [...]

(I think it more than a coincidence that in these excerpts from Seth Speaks, Seth mentions Darwin’s theory of evolution and the Biblical story of creation in the same sentence, for those systems of belief represent the two poles of the controversy over origins in our modern Western societies: the strictly Darwinistic, mechanistic view of evolution, in which the weakest of any species are ruthlessly eliminated through natural, predatory selection, and the views of the creationists, who hold that God made the earth and all of its creatures just as described in the Bible.

[...] It bothers him that some people, he thinks, consider that our books make up another bible or its equivalent, and it seems to him that their lack of understanding in that regard hampers his own creativity. [...]

“She sees herself supported in a religious sense by conventional figures from the Bible. [...]