“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Now, I will tell you (TM) something. Bega is there and I will let you tell me which portrait is his. You may ask Bega or tell me. But you did not pick the correct portrait. (TM commented that one was “too much Hebrew.”)

(TM holding up a portrait) That is not Bega! I want you to seriously consider each one of the paintings and tell me which one is Bega.

That is because it is the portrait of Bega. But you did not pick it out as your first choice. Now, Bega has been here as I have been here and he was calling you to look toward the corner of the room... and you were too intellectually smug to do so as Ruburt is often too intellectually smug to do what I ask him to do. And your own intellectual ideas prevented you from first picking out your intuitive choice, as far as the portraits were concerned.

It is your loss. Now, there is a way—when you are involved in physical activity, and even intense mental work—to change the inner focus so that you are aware of two realities at once and can manipulate quite easily in the physical reality as you must. Now, you ask your Bega, for I have told him the message, and I have told him to tell you. We shall see how good he is. And I want to know what he tells you for I want to see how he is delivering my suggestions.

(The data re the paintings—Bega—Theodore M., was interesting, etc. On July 17, Theodore purchased the painting of Bega as designated by Seth. [...]

[...] Bega is there and I will let you tell me which portrait is his. You may ask Bega or tell me. [...]

(Theodore holding up a portrait.) That is not Bega! I want you to seriously consider each one of the paintings and tell me which one is Bega! [...]

That is because it is the portrait of Bega. [...] Now, Bega has been here as I have been here and he was calling you to look toward the corner of the room—and you were too intellectually smug to do so as Ruburt is often too intellectually smug to do what I ask him to do. [...]

(The data re the paintings—Bega—Tom M, was interesting, etc. On July 17 Tom M. purchased the painting of Bega as designated by Seth. [...]

[...] You feel that the experiences are at least your own, with no Bega who must speak through you as in your writings. [...]

There was no inference made or given, and certainly not intended, that you forsake your Bega sessions. [...]

([Tom:] “Other questions might take the format of what opportunities might arise in business; the Bega development; etc...”

Bega is also doing very well.

(To Theodore) We know of course this Bega—and he is trained to do a fairly decent job with you and you are a fairly good student. [...] When you are working with Bega you must try to let down and forget your physical data, for you do not know him well enough yet. [...]

[...] My Dean, the spontaneous self that you so fear is the self that speaks to Bega. [...]

Bega is doing well in his classes, and you are doing well in these classes. [...]

[...] Later one of my students, George, picked out the painting as a portrait of a personality called Bega, who communicates with him through automatic writing. Seth corroborated this, and said that Bega is one of his own students in another level of reality.

[...] Two particular beliefs here: The party at Bega’s, and your “tirade” —his interpretation, about his dealing with Prentice on one particular occasion. [...]

Another of Rob’s “vision” portraits, this one is of Bega, a personality who communicates through one of Jane’s students via automatic writing. [...]