“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] In other words, though the ego was adopted originally by the inner self, and was a product of physical heredity and environment, it does not die; but its existence is changed from physical reality into electrical reality. [...]

They are closed enough to retain identity and separateness of characteristic natures, but because they are all formed from inner vitality, they are actually interrelated; and when I describe fields or systems I describe many portions of one reality, many faces of one reality.

[...] In the same manner do thoughts and emotions have the electric reality of which I have spoken. [...]

In a most ingenious manner, then, all of these systems, while individual, are portions of one unified reality.

[...] The direction of focus for them has changed. In the case of probable realities the focus of energy has always been different from your own. [...]

These probable realities exist within what may be generally termed your own sphere of activity, your own plane. There are many other realities that are far divorced from your own however. [...] You are literally surrounded by other realities that you do not perceive consciously. [...]

[...] The probable realities of which I have spoken are separated from your own, not in terms of space but in terms of energy focus. [...]

[...] The personality has experienced new realities since death, and is no longer precisely the person that was. [...]

[...] (Long pause.) You are both encountering new probabilities of a beneficial nature, and each time you do this you put new imprints or paths or impressions into reality, effectively changing reality in those desired ways. [...]

[...] They begin to play new notes of consciousness that change reality to whatever degree from the inside out.

You form your own reality or you do not, so let us look at your newspaper story.

[...] In that regard your society, your civilization, your way of looking at reality—all of these at that level also represent highly conventionalized behavior and learned responses.

[...] Your conscious mind, generally speaking, interprets reality according to your private beliefs and those of your civilization. [...]

[...] The household cat is exploring a different kind of nature, in which he has a certain relationship to human consciousness, a relationship that changes the reality of his particular kind of consciousness.

Once more, as I’ve done often in recent years, I expressed the hope to myself that in another probable reality very similar to this one I opted for the outdoor life in a much stronger way—even to living outside night and day for most of the year. [...] Not that I want to copy Cézanne, for instance [I couldn’t even if I wanted to], but in that other reality I too chose to live the natural life in a more naive or clear-eyed manner—to sublimate myself before nature while at the same time trying to become master of whatever means of expression I can achieve.

[...] Especially do I like to interpret his material tonight as meaning that Jane is “a psychic or a mystic,” for to me, at least, this means that in this physical life she’s chosen to penetrate as deeply as she can the depths of reality, or consciousness.

[...] At least from my viewpoint, each of nature’s rhythmic signs implied a continuity, an inevitability and security, that I’ve often felt is lacking in our all-too-human affairs—this, even though I wrote in Mass Events that Jane and I are aware, of course, of all the “good things” we humans have constructed in our mass reality. [...]

[...] For each of you are involved in changing your reality for a more beneficial one. [...]

Many are indistinguishable from others in people’s minds, but our books literally do change people’s realities, and ultimately their lives and all of the people with whom they come in contact. [...]

[...] These “invisible electromagnetic bridges” exist in networks that twine and intertwine, inclining reality to appear in certain fashions.

[...] There is often nothing to be checked in it against physical reality in a concrete manner, for the message is intuitional and internal. [...]

[...] You can instead—anyone can, that is—allow unsynchronized material from probabilities to adversely affect prime natural data, so that the safety of the moment becomes invaded by events that in certain terms have no prime reality.