“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] That is although in one way the birds that were killed were meeting a natural end, the reason behind this end was wrong in terms of emotional value and he sensed this. [...]

[...] There was nothing wrong with her mind. [...]

[...] Note that the date of Seth’s birth, given as 1486, is probably wrong. [...]

I can imagine a lovely scene where bodiless individuals, spiritual psychologists and I, sit in a dark room all dressed in gowns at another level of reality, and they ask me what is wrong with me and I say—I am obsessed. [...]

[...] Quite innocently and oh so exuberantly he leaped upon the chance to show in the record how right I was and how wrong he was, but there you have it.

[...] Backing off from the idea of Linda because she felt it was wrong, Jane compromised with the small child data.

[...] Jane said that at times she is still afraid she’ll give contradictory information involving past sessions—wrong dates, etc. [...]

[...] You have trouble now with the duration of your inner visions because you are trying to transpose them according to physical camouflage time, and this is going about it in the wrong way to begin with. [...]

“Now: Often precognitive information will appear to be wrong. [...]

[...] And I will by all means mention your own reaction, which was based on a wrong assumption.

[...] Incidentally for Ruburt’s benefit, first he finds difficulty with his writing and then gets something wrong with him physically, not the other way around.

[...] It is fashionable to say: “You are what you eat” semicolon; that, for example, “You must not eat meat because you are killing the animals, and this is wrong.” [...]

[...] Someone told me that most of our cherished ideas about the nature of reality were completely wrong. [...]

The personality has endeavored to right old wrongs, and has succeeded to a great degree, but at the risk of sacrificing inner spontaneity, and even at the risk of losing the very authoritative aspects of his nature, so that there is still a tendency to follow rather than to lead; simply because in the period of the Inquisition he was in a place of authority, he led; and he led men into atrocities committed in the fine name of principle and religion. [...]

[...] If something is wrong with the set you may simply tune in patterns that seem meaningless and carry no particular program. [...]

(To Florence:) Far be it from me to disturb your ancient ideas of yin and yang, or Jung, or good and evil, or of right and wrong, or of good and bad vibrations! [...]

[...] Of course Ruburt’s own associations are used by me, up to a certain point, to lead him to the proper subject or image … When we are successful there is a divergence from his associations so that he says the correct word, even though for him personally it may be the wrong word.

[...] There is nothing wrong with your emotions, or feelings, or being. [...]

[...] The doctor didn’t know what was wrong with his back and suggested that he spend some time under traction in the hospital. [...]

[...] “What’s wrong?” I said.

[...] Then on impulse I said mentally: “What’s wrong with John Bradley’s neck?” [Visiting last night and witnessing the 63rd session, John had remarked about the feeling of a lump inside his throat or neck, yet could not find any lump.]

(“There’s a man in there,” he said, “and there’s something wrong with him. [...]