“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(I also asked if Seth would comment upon the postponement by Gallery magazine, this month, of their interview with Jane, scheduled for January 23, a class night. [...]

[...] Ruburt did a double-take after I told you it would sell well. [...]

[...] He did not want it (in quotes) “flooding the market,” used by people who would follow the techniques and then write for help.

[...] Thus lines that were vertical at one time would become horizontal, and it seems this would apply whether in relation to her as the clairvoyant observer, or the floor or whatever. [...]

You activated it yourself, and I would not tell you this until you had completely conquered it. Ordinarily it would not have been dangerous at all, and it was not dangerous to Ruburt.

[...] In the 233rd session Seth said the article would sell, without naming the buyer, “providing Ruburt follows the way which has been set out for him.” [...]

[...] In the 277th session Seth said this book would be published. [...]

(Jane had declared before the session began tonight that she thought Seth would go into our house affairs in connection with probable realities, but that such material wouldn’t go with his book dictation on the families of consciousness. [...] Anything on our house hunting, I thought, would be welcome here because it would help unite these late sessions for “Unknown” Reality with some of its much earlier ones [in Volume 1, as it turned out]. [...]

(Sue’s note intrigued me anew: After class I promised her that not only would I search our files about Grunaargh, but that with Seth’s help Jane and I would eventually get more information on that family, and present it somewhere in the notes for “Unknown” Reality. [...]

[...] Seth remarks upon some of them after break, but the best we can offer are a few hints; otherwise all of these house notes would be much longer.

[...] In the second house your ideas of privacy were shown to you, carried to an extreme, where the windows would not even open. [...]

Put to my service during a session they would allow—the energies would allow—us to explain various principles with utmost clarity, and greatly improve our experimental data. [...]

(Jane said she had no idea of what Seth would talk about this evening, as she lay her glasses on the table at 9 PM. [...]

[...] The same amount of energy focused in an out-of-body experience would have resulted in some venture indeed. [...]

[...] Used in a projection, the same intensity of energy would allow results that could be proven without doubt, and accepted without reservation.

[...] You are much easier now, but at the time, there was an explosion of energy on your part that you did not understand, and you were afraid that in this explosion of energy you would go too far outward and there would be nothing left, so to speak, that you would get away from yourself and lose yourself beyond all hopes of recovery. [...]

(To Ron L.) I am not looking for questions, but you have been the emotional mother that you are now trying to forget, and you have been swept by those emotions that you are now afraid to release, and you have felt them as a river and have been afraid of where they would lead you. [...]

[...] She carried one on her right hip and I would say about 18 months old, about a two year old and a five year old, and the girl had braids, and they were looped around, and she had a big apron on. [...]

[...] Baenog—another letter and then oe, what you would call an outskirt of Oslo, twelve miles distant. [...]

[...] You would call yourselves fantasies. [...]

[...] I knew that he would give you a visit. [...]

[...] We have an equivalent of emotions, but you would not understand them. [...]

[...] So I would like you to listen inward to your own thoughts with this in mind. [...]

[...] I felt fine towards Joel the first night because the minute you started talking, for weeks I had been coming to class, when I would see the war paint on him I would get a terrible pain in my head. [...]

[...] Why would you go where you didn’t belong. [...]

[...] And I would do it again.”

[...] Would you feel the same kind of forgiving spirit for him and acceptance for him that you seem to for me now? [...]

[...] He glowered at our friend Ruburt with great vehemency, projecting all of the energy at his command to show that he would not be cowed, and that if anyone took over the situation he would be the one to do so. [...]

[...] The belief, you see, would work to insure the materialization of that state. [...]

[...] Of course, the wanted result is not yet physical or you would not need to create it, so it does no good to say that your physical experience seems to contradict what you are trying to do.

[...] While Jane rested, I suggested that if Seth returned it would be better if he discussed the reasons behind her coughing. [...]

This involves request from other publisher—same connection with February (the initials would be T. M. rather than Seth Material) and it would be a year off. [...]

[...] If the ideas in this book were thoroughly understood, then each individual would be able to assess his or her own reality realistically. There would be no need to arm a nation in advance against another nation’s anticipated — but imaginary — attack.

(10:10.) Personal grudges would not build up, so that men or women so fear further hurts that they attempt to hide from life or relationships, or shy away from contact with others. [...] If each of you understood and perceived the graceful integrity of your own individuality, just as you try to perceive the beauty of all other natural creatures, then you would allow your own creativity greater reign. [...]

[...] Gone are the conditions that, it would seem, caused the uprising. [...]

Part of such a brain would have to be awake all of the time, and part engaged in unconscious activity. [...]

[...] All action is change, for otherwise there would be a static universe, and then indeed death would be the end. [...]

Someone who was familiar with psychic literature and paranormal experiences would have been better prepared for these events than I was, but I would not have missed them for the world.

[...] We cannot blame God, society, or our parents for misfortunes, since before this physical life we chose the circumstances into which we would be born and the challenges that could best bring about our development. [...]

[...] Who wanted to sit around singing hymns to a father-God, even if He did exist, and what sort of intelligent God would require such constant adoration? [...]

[...] He made a few kindly but definite statements to the effect that we should know better, and suggested that the appliance be moved into the kitchen, where it would hold all our refrigerated food. If so, he assured Rob his gumboils would disappear.

[...] He even told me how many students I would have within three months’ time. I followed his advice, though I didn’t really think there would be much response in this area. [...]

Dr. Stevenson wrote us a letter much like one I would probably write today to someone else under the same circumstances. [...]

[...] At this point I’d been speaking as Seth for about forty minutes, and he recommended a rest period, saying: “Sometime between now and twenty-five years of laying your doubts at rest, I would like to go into some other matters that I have been trying to tackle for several sessions. [...]

He would wonder what collective madness made or permitted man to select, from a virtual infinity of what would appear as chaos, to select a handful, a mere handful, of similarities and call it a universe.

I would like to continue our discussion concerning the layers of the so-called subconscious, in connection now with a study of dreams.

[...] And even a simple dream that would seem to be concerned with trivial daily events is in reality concerned with much more.

[...] She said that for some reason she was aware that when the session began she would be “far-out” right away. [...]

[...] Those plans gradually evaporated as I realized that it would take many pages to compare the two viewpoints in any detail. [...] If they knew about it, I expect that most members of the scientific community would disagree with much of the excellent material Seth gave in this session. Not all would—or will—of course. [...]

[...] Others would want much more excitement, much more zest, and order then instead a less grand vessel, but one that went faster. Some would set goals for themselves that demanded that their powers of seamanship be tested. [...]

However, if given a choice, Jane and I now would forgo the “benefits” stemming from animal experimentation, even if our own future welfares were to suffer because of a subsequent lack of knowledge—and providing that at a time of crisis we didn’t weaken in our joint resolve! Following such a course would actually be most difficult, so pervasive in our society are the results flowing from animal research: I even think it might be necessary to live as a hermit in the wild to get away from them. [...]

[...] (Pause.) If there were no idiots among you, you would soon find that geniuses were absent also.

[...] Sometimes the name of one man would be given as a reign covering a span of years.

[...] Poison was the usual method, and even those who suspected the truth would not dare speak out.

The records would show one reign of one pope; but one, two, or even three different men may have filled the position. [...]

[...] If they were seriously in the running, you see, the rewards would be great to their followers. [...]

[...] I had the vague idea that I’d use the drawings as references for portraits that I would paint of her. They would be unique, I thought. [...]

[...] Without the responses of others, Jane and I often said, where would we be? [...]

When Jane published The Seth Material in 1970, we were quite unprepared for the impact her work would have. [...]

[...] She did not choose a situation in which either her health or beauty would be imperiled. [...] Any difficulties encountered there would automatically have a kind of glamour and distinction. [...]

[...] She had been told by different “psychics” that she would be a psychic teacher, and various words and techniques had been given her to ward off the “evil” influence.

Now: Dineen carefully chose the territory in which these adventures would take place. [...]

[...] She will avoid any kind of disfiguration or severe health problem, which to her would be a far greater danger. [...]

[...] During last night’s session she gave this age for her own life span, and said I would live to be 87. [...] Later Seth corrected the distorted data, telling us Jane too would live that long.)

[...] I would like to give you some further data concerning probabilities and the inverted time system.

[...] You can see that it would be highly ridiculous to say that the material on your Mono One was any more or any less valid than your material on Mono Two. [...]

[...] The portion of the self, or rather the portions of the self, that experience action in terms of what the ego would term probability, is further divorced from the ego, however, and this probability reality appears to the ego very rarely, and only very occasionally.

[...] If your psychologists and scientists would begin a study of their own dreams, they would learn much through personal experience.

(In the last session Seth said the possibility existed that we would have four or five witnesses for the session tonight. [...]

There are a few points I would like to make. [...]

[...] We are building up a foundation here, in which words are important, and for which incidentally subconscious shorthand symbols would be of little use.

[...] The light will lead you into knowledge that you would not have known otherwise, nor would you have sought it as vigorously.

[...] For his abilities could not have been used fully in this existence and he would have met frustration.

Now, he would have been highly frustrated had he continued. [...]

[...] It would have been indeed almost a penance for him to have stayed here longer. [...]