“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Let that focus falter for a briefest amount of time, and the whole house of cards would come tumbling down, so to speak.

[...] At this point in her life, she has actually refused to concentrate upon languages, which would tend to tie her more tightly to the details of the world. [...]

[...] You were afraid that then he would not try to resume making it on his own. [...]

This session will be brief, because I would like you to use the rest of the session time to read from the latest material, and discuss it. [...]

It would seem to be the commemoration of a murder to me.

This place is fairly modern, and fairly, it would seem, American by contrast to other places they visit, but only by contrast.

[...] All action consists of change, for otherwise there would be a static universe, and indeed death would then be the end. [...]

[...] This would involve such related matters as the soul, energy transformation, cycles on our plane, spirituality, the “source of the source,” the Crucifixion, beginnings and endings, prayer and the will to be, etc. [...]

[...] She manifested this same ability during the 169th session, held in Dr. Instream’s office in Oswego, NY, but I would say that her switching back and forth this evening was more rapid. [...]

[...] I have known several doubting Jesuits, but it would take me several hours to tell you about them. [...]

[...] I could tell you much about Joseph and Denmark, but I would not divulge the circumstances in which he was so unfortunately involved.

[...] Before, he would not accept the challenge. [...]

[...] All I can say is— what would they be like if they didn’t... [...]

It is all I need to say, if you would for once, each of you, clearly understand. [...]

[...] It would be better for now (underlined) that he concentrates upon this—his work and full activities. [...]

If you have thought that the universe followed a mechanistic model, then you would have to say that each portion of this “cosmic machine” created itself, knowing its position in the entire “future construction.” You would have to say further that each portion came gladly out of its own source individually, neatly tailored to its position, while at the same time that individual source was also as intimately the source of each other individual portion.

[...] How would theology, or the sociology of science, answer any or all of these questions?

[...] Then just before the session started, she said it would concern dictation on Seth’s new book.)

[...] On the other hand, you create physical time for your psyche, for without you there would be no experience of the seasons, their coming and their passing.

There would be no experience of what Ruburt (Seth’s “entity” name for Jane) calls “the dear privacy of the moment,” so if one portion of your being wants to rise above the solitary march of the moments, other parts of your psyche rush, delighted, into that particular time-focus that is your own. [...]

[...] Since this is the third such break between book sessions, it seems that Jane and I would be used to the idea by now. [...]

[...] I have used television as an analogy at various times, and I would like to do so again, to show the ways in which physical events are formed, and to try to describe the many methods used by individuals in choosing those particular events that will be personally encountered.

[...] You would not know how to do it, for your life flows through you automatically and spontaneously. [...]

[...] It would be advantageous to check with me before you enter such endeavors.

[...] We were told, in a strong and echoing Seth voice, to let the poor man rest in peace; he would be “here” for a while longer yet, then leave. [...]

[...] The system itself would appear insane without them, and only they impart any sanity. [...]

[...] If the sorrows and agonies within your system were not felt as real, the lessons would not be learned. [...]

[...] The point I stressed—politely—was that at this time I wouldn’t make a move without legal advice, and that I wasn’t going to do anything that would compromise our position versus the insurance company.

[...] I filled out the menu for tomorrow so that I too would receive a full Christmas dinner to eat with her. [...]

[...] I would like you to follow then, to close your eyes. [...]

(To Arnold.) I would like you to do some more writing, for you will have results from that if you continue with it faithfully. [...]

[...] Now, when you try to adjust your dreaming set in the same way that you would the waking one, you end up with static and blurred images. [...]

[...] The appropriate action would be to turn the station off.

[...] When she read it to me I knew at once that it would go here, for a few words she certainly sang of the basic theme of these essays—of the sublime, immortal consciounesses of the earth and All That Is, of that loving redemption that consciousness always makes possible somehow, somewhere, in the eternal private world of each of us, and that each of us always seeks:

[...] If so—that in itself is quite legitimate and important; yet I feel, felt, Seth’s personality in a way super-straddle my own as I know it; and that is what the heroic dimensions would do....

[...] Before the session I asked if Seth would discuss the Time Magazine cover story about Richard Bach in the November 13th issue, published November 6; and the various predictions made re sales, etc., in the recent deleted sessions.)