“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] This would be very important, for now her hips wouldn’t always be laying upon the bed like a dead weight. [...]

[...] “It would be nice if I got home by Christmas,” she said. [...]

[...] I told her her vision would continue to improve, and am very enthusiastic about this. [...]

[...] Again, I told her she would be able to. [...]

[...] “If it never happened, it would mean the body consciousness was always subservient to other more dominant portions of the personality, and I don’t think that’s true either. [...]

With free will, however, it is not possible for the body consciousness to be given full and clear dominion, for that would deny large areas of choices, and cut off facets of learning. [...]

[...] Of course he would not consciously admit these feelings, considering such sentiments were unbecoming on his part. [...]

[...] Now, this is the heart of the matter, and he would not let me give it earlier. [...]

[...] “If anyone lived to be even 20 years old under those circumstances,” I told Jane, “it would have been a miracle.” [...]

[...] She’d already told me she thought Seth would comment on the movie.)

[...] I hoped Seth would comment.

[...] This would be especially true of behaviorism. [...]

[...] Otherwise he would always tell himself that he believed money basically unimportant because he was not able to achieve it.

[...] Being a writer would give him status even if he did not make money, though he hoped to.

[...] In later years however, and partially as a result of the relationship between the two of you, and your joint ideas, Ruburt became worried that he would not do his thing as a writer. [...]

[...] For “the writer” ideas, carried to extremes, would even have gobbled the dream work, where both are one.

[...] If the former is the case, that portion would know that the quicker we get the organism out of the hospital environment the quicker a true healing can begin. [...]

You probably also came to this conclusion by yourselves, and while I would not make the habit of beginning our sessions later than usual, occasionally such tardiness is more than justified. [...]

If it seems to you that there is a great gap existing within Christianity, between ideals expressed, and actions, then let me tell you that conditions would indeed be far worse if these ideals had not initially been expressed, and if they were not yearly reaffirmed.

[...] Were it not for this your whole race would be in much more serious a predicament.

[...] It was as though she had passed through some great experience in triumph, she said, and would not be called upon to repeat it—all the travail, etc., involved.

[...] This would be a triumph. [...]

[...] This would leave only the recourse of going back to the data later, if we want more information, when it is “cold.”)

[...] I simply wanted you to know that I was here, as I said I would be. [...]

[...] Their own development however would not be as complete had they chosen to ignore the responsibility. [...]

[...] If you would but realize it, it is within you. [...]

[...] He was afraid they would drown him. [...]

[...] Had the dream not ended you would have made your way across to him, in time (smile), to help him up when he fell—this symbolic of his difficulties in the past year. [...]

[...] In themselves they represent greater development on your part, or you would not be able to perceive them. [...]

(According to the theory of relativity, no particle can be accelerated to the speed of light because its mass would become infinitely large as it approached light’s velocity; but this barrier is bypassed by stating that the particles in question have an imaginary proper mass — not rest mass — that is never less than the speed of light. [...]

[...] You simply would not perceive such particles as mass. [...]

[...] Usually Ruburt reacted to these adversely at his end — that is, the interference was such that it would bother his situation rather than mine.

(Our region is supposed to be outside the danger zone — yet we see conflicting newspaper reports about whether the prevailing wind currents would make us vulnerable to the after-effects of a meltdown. [...] It would be hardly a coincidence, I added, that the mass events at Jonestown and Three Mile Island took place within less than six months of each other, and that they represented the two poles, or extremes, of mankind’s present main belief systems: religion and science.

There was a tie-in, and it’s that the Christ drama happened as a result of man’s dream, at least, of achieving brotherhood — a quiet, secure sense of consciousness, and a morality that would sustain him in the physical world.

[...] Protection is being planned against looting, which, it is estimated, would begin “two to three hours after the evacuees are gone.” [...]

None of them want any disaster, and yet some of them think it would serve the people right — for then the people might realize that politicians do not understand science, and that the scientists should after all be put in control: “We must have enough money, or who knows what can go wrong?”

[...] We think such alternate sources should be pursued even if they cost more in economic terms than nuclear power, either initially or continually, for surely none of them could produce the horrendous results — and enormous costs — that would follow even one massive failure at a nuclear power plant.

(“Who or what would we contact?”)

(Jane had remarked that several times during the session, she appeared to know what the answer to my questions would be, before the board spelled them out.

[...] We had also been wondering how successful we would be at resuming this contact when next we tried.

(She waited to see what she’d be doing next, then told me she would have a short session, after she finished her cigarette.)

[...] I suppose my readiness was at least partially founded upon the idea that it would be a good thing for Jane to speak through Seth about other matters occasionally than her symptoms and related topics. [...]

Would-be suicides, for all their secrecy, usually do mention the subject to a friend, relative, or close family member. [...]

Indeed, part of the would-be suicide’s dilemma may be caused by a lack of communication with others, a misinterpretation of the motives of friends or family members, and a difficulty in expressing one’s own needs and wishes.

[...] To these the physical personality would seem like a supraself.

[...] As far as she was aware, she said, she hadn’t been reading any material lately that would have given rise to the content of the session.)