Results 21 to 40 of 1198 for (stemmed:what AND stemmed:realiti)

NoME Part Two: Chapter 3: Session 817, January 30, 1978 myths mythical disaster factual manifestations

(10:43.) Give us a moment… Most people interpret the realities of their lives, their triumphs and failures, their health or illness, their fortune or misfortune, then, in the light of a mythical reality that is not understood as such. What is behind these myths, and what is their source of power?

Give us a moment… Before we discuss man’s and woman’s private roles in the nature of mass events — no matter what they are — we must first look into the medium in which events appear concrete and real. The great sweep of the events of nature can be understood only by looking into a portion of their reality that is not apparent to you. [...]

[...] What then is myth, and what do I mean by the term?

ECS3 ESP Class Session, February 2, 1971 wisdom props phlegm intellect Joel

Now unless you come to terms with your own doubts about yourselves then you will have no idea what faith is and when I use the word faith, I am not speaking in religious terms. When you look at your physical reality and see what it is this does not take faith, it is a simple matter of physical perception. When, however, you begin to have glimpses about the nature of reality and realize that you are more than you know that you are now, then it takes faith to bring that inner image close to some actuality, in your terms. [...]

Now when you begin to sense the interior invisible self then in physical terms you begin to act upon what you call faith. [...] Faith, however, is not believing in a unreality, it is believing in realities that you cannot, at this point physically, perceive. [...] It is banking on the invisible self that, as yet you have not been able to actualize in physical reality. [...]

Now I am not trying to tell you what to do, I am trying to release the portion of you that knows playfully what to do. [...] You are to come to release portions of your own reality and then watch yourselves run or fly or soar. [...]

ECS2 ESP Class Session, June 23, 1970 couch transpose solid organization assumptions

There are other root assumptions that you take as a basis of reality. And in other levels of reality there are other root assumptions. [...] It is amazing what you can do with nothing!! [...]

[...] If you were able to focus your attention upon the dissimilarities, merely those that you can perceive but do not, then you would be amazed that mankind could form any idea of an organized reality. [...] You merely perceive it as vacant because you do not perceive what is there. [...]

What so many want is a god who walks down the street and says “Happy Sunday, I am I, follow Me.” But God is hidden craftily in His creations so that He is what they are and they are what He is, and in knowing them, you know Him. [...]

UR2 Introductory Notes by Robert F. Butts Volume Unknown reader ideal sections

[...] Here, I wish to make it clear that [“Unknown” Reality] will initiate a journey in which it may seem that the familiar is left far behind. Yet when I am finished, I hope you will discover that the known reality is even more precious, more ‘real,’ because you will find it illuminated both within and without by the rich fabric of an ‘unknown’ reality now seen emerging from the most intimate portions of daily life…. Your concepts of personhood are now limiting you personally and en masse, and yet your religions, metaphysics, histories, and even your sciences are hinged upon your ideas of who and what you are. Your psychologies do not explain your own reality to you. [...] Your religions do not explain your greater reality, and your sciences leave you just as ignorant about the nature of the universe in which you dwell.

[...] A second group stems from what Seth says, and what we’ve come to believe about what he tells us. [...] As he told us in the 681st session for Volume 1 of “Unknown” Reality:

I used that information of Seth’s many times while working with “Unknown” Reality. Even so, I learned that on such a long-term project it’s easy to lose that acute sense of what one really wants to do and show — but I also learned how to constantly renew my focus. This presented me with what seemed like an endless series of challenges, yet I discovered again and again that I enjoyed them: Each time I sat down to work, whether on the most routine short note or the most complicated appendix, I searched for that particular, personal sense of intense concentration on the matter at hand. [...]

SS Part Two: Chapter 9: Session 535, June 17, 1970 death alive dead gaps unaliveness

[...] What you want to know, therefore, is what happens when your consciousness is directed away from physical reality, and when momentarily it seems to have no image to wear.

[...] What you are begins to include what you have been in other lives, and you begin to make plans for your next physical existence, if you decide upon one. You can instead enter another level of reality, and then return to a physical existence if you choose.

What happens at the point of death? [...] I will attempt to give you a practical answer to what you think of as this practical question, however. What the question really means to most people is this: What will happen when I am not alive in physical terms any longer? What will I feel? [...]

ECS4 ESP Class Session, November 2, 1971 bull pasture listen Gert silence

Now what I am saying sounds extremely simple, easy, and it would make very uninteresting prose but the reality that exists within my words is vital and the reality that you can experience if you follow my words is vital. As our friend over here began to experience what happens when Ruburt leaves trance, so your thoughts leave their own pattern, and your emotions impress the physical reality that you know with all kinds of effects of which you are unaware. [...]

[...] There should be questions in your mind besides, what was I in the previous life? [...] Such as, what is the nature of reality? [...]

[...] Simply watch the experience that you have and try not to transpose old concepts upon it, but leave yourselves open for the fresh experience of what is now. [...] Your thoughts, all of your thoughts at this moment, to you seem to come and go without a trace and yet they leave traces that you do not see, nor perceive, nor even sense, and yet if you quietly examine your experience, if you listen to the universe, you can begin to perceive some of these realities and that is what I want you to do. [...]

ECS4 ESP Class Session, July 13, 1971 Ron proofs cards Tom suburbanite

[...] You create and form your own reality, but you create and form more realities than you consciously realize. Now it is possible, you see, and you are trying to bring what you think of as your conscious self into some awareness of what these other portions of the inner self are up to so, supposing we call your presently conscious self your immediate self. [...] Now the immediate self can indeed become aware of other portions of your own reality, and it is up to you to bring it into line. [...]

Now you are both channels, in those terms, for what you might think of as both white holes and black holes. You are channels through which various realities merge and meet and in which transmutations constantly occur. [...] You are meeting places where other realities merge and meet. [...]

[...] When you read the record you will realize that is not what I said. I said, recognize within yourself those evils that you recognize in others, but I meant only those things that in your own mind you set up as evil for you project those things upon others and make your own reality. [...] And that is what I want you to understand. [...]

SS Part Two: Chapter 10: Session 538, June 29, 1970 death evil explore preconceptions sleeping

[...] Now, in physical life you see what you want to see. You perceive from the available field of reality certain data — data selected carefully by you in accordance with your ideas of what reality is. [...]

Pretend for a moment that you are a child, and I am trying to undertake the particular chore of explaining to you what your most developed, adult self will be like — and in my explanation, I say that this adult self is to some extent already a part of you, an outgrowth or projection of what you are. And the child says, “But what will happen to me? [...] How can I ever be this adult self when it is not what I am now, without dying as what I am?”

[...] So you can say that certain portions of it deal with physical reality, physical manipulation, and plans; some with deeper levels of creativity and achievement that insure physical survival; some with communication, with even more extensive elements of the personality now generally unknown; some with the continuing experience and existence of what you may call the soul or overall individual entity, the true multidimensional self.

SS Appendix: ESP Class Session: Tuesday, February 9, 1971 Bernice predestination aristocratic slums justification

The personality is given the greatest gift of all; you get exactly what you want to get. [...] But realize also that you are responsible for your joys and triumphs, and that the energy to create any of these realities comes from the inner self. What you do with it is up to the individual personality.

[...] That is the reality which you are seeking. [...] Do you need an old dead thing like me to tell you what life is? [...]

[...] Every thought that you have now changes reality. Not only reality as you know it, but all reality. [...]

ECS3 ESP Class Session, March 2, 1971 Ned sad Gert secrets sensitive

Now we have spoken in terms that you could understand, the nature of your world and reality as you know it, but you have not taken the stuff of reality into your hearts and understood it and this is what you must now begin to learn to do. [...] The reality of what you are now and then you can begin to work with what you are and what you have. [...]

[...] What I want you to do is to admit here the things that are important to you that you have not told. [...] These secrets, you know, very important to you, very important to you, are very jovial in the nature of All That Is and hardly significant in the nature of reality. [...]

Now there is a point within each of you, at this moment, in this room at this time, that is a connection with all of reality that you can ever know and this point is a point of feeling. [...] The point of reality within you that you try to escape because you are afraid of reality and unwilling to accept the responsibilities of it and so you form pseudorealities. [...]

ECS3 ESP Class Session, February 9, 1971 predestination Joel Florence slums justify

You have in the past, collectively or individually, to blame a God or a fate for the nature of your personal realities, those aspects, indeed, that you did not like. [...] You get exactly what you want to get. [...] And realize also, that the energy to create any of these realities comes from the inner self. The energy, but what you do with it is up to the individual personality. [...]

Now no one asked me what it was like when I go in trance. Now to go into a trance is simply to focus intensely in a highly specific area of reality and, therefore, I throw or project a part of what I am here because I am able to utilize greater areas of my personality than those with which you are now acquainted in yourself. [...]

[...] That is the reality for which you are seeking. [...] Do you need an old dead thing like me to tell you what life is? [...]

ECS3 ESP Class Session, April 13, 1971 secrets Joel vulnerable Ron divulge

[...] Feel the vitality that is within you show itself in those forms that are natural to it whether they be imaginative, intellectual or feeling reality. [...] The freedom and spontaneity of spirituality cannot be maintained or even tasted by denying the reality of the physical being. You use the physical being, and from there and from your emotions you become acquainted with other realities. [...] In this manner the natural world that you know will become a threshold of what you call spiritual activity and not a barrier to it. [...]

Now what makes you ask the question or doubt that any reality could be without it, for it is the basis for any reality that any consciousness knows. [...] But the innate love within you, that you are often too embarrassed to express, forms the planet that you know, the physical bodies that you inhabit, the seasons and the reality in which you presently have your existence. [...]

[...] What the meaning of your existence in your reality is, the one goal of everything you do?”)

TES9 Session 469 March 19, 1969 medium perception perceived brain apparition

The medium perceives so clearly the reality of the surviving personality that the medium to some extent directly perceives that reality. You see the correlation here with what I told you in the past about experiencing concepts. [...] To experience the reality of another does not necessarily mean that the medium negates her own personality—only that momentarily she allows it to perceive as directly as possible the experience of what it is to be the other. This involves a high degree of cooperation from the other person who does not exist in your physical terms, an opening of his reality to the medium rather than an invasion of the medium.

[...] In your system of reality you are learning what mental energy is, and how to use it. [...] What seems to be a perception, an objective concrete event, independent and apart from you the perceiver, is instead the physical materialization of the perceiver’s own inner emotions, energy and mental environment.

[...] It is the ego’s idea of what is possible, the ego’s concept of reality, that determines in a large manner whether or not the brain will interpret any particular data.

TES7 Seth’s Lecture to Pat’s Boston High School Class March 25, 1967 classroom hell kill chromosomes Pat

Anything that you can see and feel and touch exists within your own reality, yes, and within it, it is legitimate and valid. [...] They form reality for you, and yet the reality that they form is highly distorted; and what you see, dear friends, does not exist and you do not see what does exist.

If you do not like what you see, then who is to blame? [...] Certain telepathic connections exist which are what we term root assumptions, of which you are all telepathically aware. Using these you form a physical environment that is cohesive enough so that you can all agree with what you see and feel and smell and touch.

You will find exactly what you wish to find. You will make of your lives exactly what you expect to make of your lives. [...]

SS Part One: Chapter 3: Session 519, March 23, 1970 computer illusion environment intrude assumptions

Root assumptions are those built-in ideas of reality of which I spoke — those agreements upon which you base your ideas of existence. [...] Each system of reality has its own set of such agreements. [...] As a teacher it is part of my job to understand and use these, and I have had existences in many such systems as a part of what you may call my basic training; though in your terms my associates and I had other names for them.

When I enter your system, I intrude into three-dimensional reality, and you must interpret what happens in the light of your own root assumptions. Now whether or not you realize it, each of you intrudes into other systems of reality in your dream states without the full participation of your normally conscious self. [...]

My environment, as I mentioned earlier, is not one of a personality recently dead in your terms, but later I will describe what you can expect under those conditions. [...] We understand the reality of mental acts and recognize their brilliant validity. We accept them for what they are, and therefore we are beyond the necessity to materialize them and interpret them in such a rigid manner.

ECS3 ESP Class Session, May 4, 1971 Ron tale strobe fable movement

[...] But as the word evolution is the title for a fine tale with a little truth in it, and much distortion, so also, must the realities of consciousness sometimes be explained in terms that you can understand and in terms of your own time concepts. So what you understand of reincarnation, and of the time terms involved, is what you have been told so that you could understand it, but it is a very simplified tale, indeed. [...] It seems very difficult for you to understand the fact that you live many realities at one time, simultaneously, and since the time scheme seems to be such a reality to you, the multidimensional aspects of your own consciousness are explained in those terms. [...]

I hate to tell you this, and I cannot follow through in one evening’s session, but the idea of movement and the idea of time are not at all connected in reality. [...] There is motion that exists only in terms of what I call value fulfillment. [...]

[...] Along with it you have settled upon one line of reality. This you endorse as reality, and anything outside of it does not have your stamp of approval, so therefore, it seems to you that it cannot exist, in your terms. [...]

ECS2 ESP Class Session, November 24, 1970 crossroads Derek soul Rachel flower

[...] He would not find the reality of the seed. [...] He cannot tell you what you are feeling or thinking or touch the reality of your subjective experience and herein lies your reality and your proof and your existence and your feeling. [...]

Now, I will tell you something else that you will not necessarily want to hear, but you must also learn to relate to outside physical reality. [...] This will improve your painting, your creative life, and your psychic life, but you are turning inward too much without knowing what you are doing, at this time. [...]

[...] What has happened to the summertime, and will it never come again for me?” That is what you are doing now. [...]

ECS2 ESP Class Session, December 8, 1970 Florence puritan umbrella guts violence

(To Mary Ellen.) You knew what the message would be before you came here on a subconscious basis and Ruburt, all unaware, has already delivered it to you, and it was in his terms to cool it because spontaneity must progress at its own rate and feel comfortable in both physical reality and inner reality. You are not to go into inner reality like a door to a closet, and close the door behind you. [...]

Now, in all of your minds there is still this conception that what you want to do automatically, because you want to do it, must be wrong because it is too easy. Now reality is easy. [...]

[...] What I want to do is to make you realize you can increase your awareness of reality and those experiences you had this evening you can have in your own psychological time experiences to a far greater degree. [...]

UR1 Section 2: Session 695 May 6, 1974 photograph species probable picture specimen

(“What we know of the species can be compared to what we know about ourselves as individuals. In one way both concepts are on the same level, and deal with realities in consecutive time sequences. The individual, like the species, exists in multidimensional terms; and hovers around focuses of probabilities, weaving in and out of alternate realities constantly.

[...] It came about because we’d been discussing our deceased parents and probabilities, in connection with the first two sessions [679–80] of “Unknown” Reality. [...] The night before last, then, I told Jane about my idea of asking Seth to comment upon early photographs of her parents, Marie and Delmer,1 to see what would develop in the material.

[...] What similarities are there that unite both photographs in your mind? What experiences did you have when each photograph was taken? What ways did you think of following in one picture that were not followed in the other one? [...] In your mind follow what directions that self would have taken, as you think of such events. [...]

ECS3 ESP Class Session, February 16, 1971 Kyle Bobby Joel blessings saintly

[...] Now, to some extent, what you say is true and yet much of this is not of my doing. [...] You will not learn nearly as much from me as you will through traveling through your own inner self and searching into the reality of yourself for other realities that are also there of which your are unaware. [...]

You are meant to judge physical reality. You are meant to realize that physical reality is a materialization of your thoughts and feelings and images. [...] And when you imagine that you can destroy a reality, you can only destroy a reality as you know it, the reality itself will continue to exist. [...]

To explain the analogy that is what I used, but the feeling of continuity is continuous. [...] You only accept as real those moments in which you are aware within physical reality. [...]

← Previous   Next →