“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] An interesting point of view.)

[...] Actually, however, it was the simple extension of such a feeling into the psychic realm, where it was further hardened by many religious views. [...]

First of all, let us get a clearer view of your own intents through the years. [...]

This other portion of yourself will also view his reality from your vantage point, and your ideas will stimulate his own, and both of you will gain from the encounter. [...]

[...] The exteriorized consciousness will always see such an event as an earthquake by viewing only its immediate, sometimes tragic, results. [...]

The question about the subconscious’s view of the body will be answered along with the other one, and at our next session. [...]

[...] Because of this you have been able to relate to yourself and to others in a more effective manner and to understand others from a different point of view. [...]

[...] Such ideas are surely the projections of a limited human view, we think, and are quite misleading. [...]

(Jane has just finished the final typing of her own The World View of Paul Cézanne, and now I’m ready to type the finished version of Volume I of Seth’s “Unknown” Reality. [...]

[...] I was able to move about, changing my position to get a better view. [...]

[...] He views suffering as simply an attribute of consciousness and an indication of vitality, considered alarming only by those areas of identity that still fear death as an end.

[...] It is therefore able to view the self as a whole, with its past and present life. [...]

In other words, a dream allows the inner self to view itself within the spacious present. [...]

[...] I’m viewing it from an entirely different perspective. [...]

[...] I think they’re both well worth having on record, since Jane’s experience was a profound one — and, in my opinion, very revealing for what it tells us about how we ordinarily view our mundane physical reality, and about the much more powerful versions, or “models,” for that reality that exist behind it.

Iran’s fundamentalist Islamic orientation is directly opposed to the secular or worldly view of government espoused in Western lands. [...]

[...] It’s just as foolish for those who are religious, even though they outnumber the scientists by far, to expect most scientists to embrace religion, to surrender their agnosticism or atheism, to give up their mechanistic, reductionist views of life—their attempts to use a series of “logical” steps to reduce the human being, say, to his or her ever-lower components, right down to the atomic level. [...]

[...] But she more than proved her own intuitive grasp of nature, and of my own desires, by producing for me as a Christmas present [© 1977] her excellent book, The World View of Paul Cézanne: A Psychic Interpretation….

[...] My feelings toward the Sinful Self were certainly not charitable, nor was I about to concede it a state of grace in view of its damaging actions, even if Jane has ignored it and shut off communication. [...]

[...] The nightly portions of your personalities have become strangers to you — for as you identify with what you think of as your rational intellect, then you identify it further with the daytime hours, with the objective world that becomes visible in the morning, with the clearcut physical objects that are then before your view.

[...] I like to keep such penetrating remarks before me, and wish the reader would too, for I often fear they’ll become lost from conscious view within his material. [...]

Jehovah and the Christian version of God brought about a direct conflict between the so-called forces of good and the so-called forces of evil by largely cutting out all of the intermediary gods, and therefore destroying the subtle psychological give-and-take that occurred between them—among them—and polarizing man’s own view of his inner psychological reality.

[...] Inner invisible relationships are allowed to rise, the acknowledged recognized reality viewed through the lenses of these emerging relationships. [...]

[...] It seems to you that there are divisions within it, but it is only because from your point of view, you are working upward. [...]

Hopefully in this book we will put you in touch with your own being as it exists outside of the context in which you are used to viewing it.