“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Ruburt’s way of forgetting past books is a natural and good one for him. It conflicts with your natural way. The two ways can complement each other if you understand this, as you are beginning to. In your society, with your ideas, you have paved a way for yourselves. The books sustain you financially. People do accept you, and in a way that is quite important to their pocketbooks, and in times that are not financially good. Forget the taxes. If they seem unfair to you, they are unfair to many—you are not being singled out in that regard.

[...] Here you associate him with your mother, and Ruburt feels this unfair. [...]

(One of the questions concerned Seth’s material on page 218 of the last session, when he referred to the feeling that Jane and I have, that we had “an even more unfair advantage” without children—this, as he’d stated earlier, on top of our already being set apart from others because of our creative gifts. [...]

He felt it unfair to keep at you for emotional expression of love through verbalization and touch when it was not natural to you. [...]

[...] You have every right to state your clear objections to Prentice about whatever issue you feel unfair. [...]

[...] I felt upon my heart the heavy unkind mark of Cain, sensing that humanity carries (unfairly) the almost indelible strain—the tragic flaw—[of] being tinged by sin and ancient iniquities. [...]

[...] So I maintain that I am being unfairly attacked (perhaps that is too strong a word) for personally accepting in my own understanding a philosophy to which ten millions and more have also succumbed, and to which the “wisest” of the species have given their loyalty and trust.

[...] Because your parents rather than his were involved you felt sadness and concern, because such a move on your part, you felt, would be unfair.

[...] However I have been unfair, and I will admit it. [...]

[...] In short, I thought it grossly unfair that the cause of the accident was still alive—although hospitalized —while two “innocent” victims were dead, with a whole family damaged beyond repair, for life. [...]

[...] Without such concerns, you began to feel that you had an even more unfair advantage. [...]

[...] It is quite unfair to say that it cannot transport itself, since it does so to an amazing degree; the roots and limbs moving in all directions. [...]

[...] This would be very unfair and misleading.

[...] While this presents a rather hilarious image, it is actually unfair. [...]

[...] It is quite unfair to say that it cannot transport itself since it does so to an amazing degree, the roots and limbs moving in all directions. [...]

It would be unfair of me to back upon an elderly gentleman’s desire for immortality, and I would never stoop to such a practice. [...]

[...] I felt upon my heart the heavy unkind mark of Cain, sensing that humanity carries (unfairly) the almost indelible strain—the tragic flaw—[of] being tinged by sin and ancient iniquities. [...]