“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Is this language a truth? [...]

[...] Therefore, you will leave behind many of the truths that are now familiar to you, the words that you take for granted. [...]

[...] But a trickery that is in its own way as truthful as revelations that you are. [...]

[...] Although each of you realizes privately the truth, and the truth is not easy to put into words, no one can do more than approximate it. [...]

He saw in his time how so-called mysticism and even dedication, without discipline, could divert energy, distort truths and pervert causes. [...]

The dilemma was, here now, between truth—a literal translation of ancient records—or a creative approach which could lead to falsification, so he was highly suspicious of the creativity in himself. [...]

[...] He was appalled that your ability, while disciplined, lacked the intent and purpose, the search for truth and meaning, he felt being adulterated. [...]

Truths.

Yes truthes.

In the first of those two lives, both of you to some extent tried to enforce your ideas of truth through force, physically. [...] You were involved with your ideas of truth in an entirely different context, as was much of Europe at that time, and some of the world now.

[...] The realization of Nebene would automatically lead you to question, to bring to your conscious attention characteristics that otherwise you may not have recognized; blocks to your creativity, and yet strong drives toward the nature of truth, from which your creativity also springs.

For Nebene’s being was deeply involved with the search for truth. [...]

[...] To alter them through carelessness seemed almost a sacrilege, a betrayal of truth. In that regard you saw yourself as the guardian of truth. [...]

This time in a strange way the circle returns and yet opens, for you find yourself searching out anew the truths that you once copied with such great faithfulness. [...]

You also understand the nature of “truth” (in quotes) better than you did, and are beginning to allow it its mobility and ever-changing grace in your paintings and in our work.

Religion and science both loudly proclaim their search for truth, although they are seemingly involved in completely opposing systems. They both treat their beliefs as truths (underlined), with which no one should tamper. [...]

[...] They claim to have the way toward truth. Their “truth” is to be found by studying the objective world, the world of objects, including animals and stars, galaxies and mice — but by viewing these objects as if they are themselves without intrinsic value, as if their existences have no meaning (intently).

(“Will we be able to tell others the truth?”)

When you learn truths.

(“How do we learn these truths?”)

[...] The world’s view was a religious one, specified by the church, and its word was truth and fact at the same time.

[...] Suffering sent by God was considered a fact of life, then, and a religious truth as well.

[...] In man’s history there have been all kinds of incantations, meant to mollify the evil spirits that man believed were real in fact and in religious truth.

The material in Personal Reality, however, contains psychological and psychic truths. Those truths have indeed, and as of now, helped millions of people. [...]

[...] Both of you found it quite necessary to take a strong conscious, critical look at the material from the beginning, for your trainings told you, in the terms that you understood them, that the “subconscious” could be very misleading, though creative, and that therefore you must critically examine any intuitive productions that profess themselves to stand as truths rather than as creative fictions in your world.

[...] There was stuff I’ve also forgotten though that made me waken at once, furious; some connection between the two books, also whole bunches of feelings rise to my mind about the disclaimer being like a sign or statement that I’m a liar or that my work isn’t truthful or like, hell, the letter A for adulteress they used to pin on wicked women.... [...]

[...] Like many young men all through the ages he was on his individual journey, looking for truth, overturning all stones in an effort to find those methods that would help him discover — in capitals — THE WAY.

[...] The doctor offered greater freedom and the hope that perhaps chemically the doors to truth, within his own soul at least, could be opened. [...]

He saw the sick, unhappy and neurotic brought to this new temple of truth in which chemicals take the place, say, of communion of bread. [...]

[...] Even the early environment, so abhorred by the ego, were chosen in order to deepen the desire for truth and to force the personality to face the issues of life and death, evil and goodness, full face. [...]

[...] The hypocrisy of the organizations blinded you to the inner truth of the symbols.

[...] The search for answers, and this passionate yearning toward truth, has driven Ruburt’s personality, and he became ill only when he was afraid to continue the search, because it led him into byways that he had not planned upon; or rather, upon which the ego had not planned.

1. Read Point of Power in Reality and apply that truth to Ruburt’s condition.

[...] It is besieged by truth to the 3rd power, truth being one, hand in hand with 7. Three C (E?), 3C, over 9 to the 7th power, will temporarily equate with 9 over 137, might give you truth.

All of this is premature, for the equation itself bears little basic reality to truth. [...]

[...] Grouped generally under the values of the simple 7, plus and minus the magnitude of the 7 as it goes through the zero, brings you a multidimensional concept that equates with truth.

This is the experiment that has not been tried, and these are the truths that you must learn after physical death. Some, after death, understanding these truths, choose to return to physical existence and explain them. [...]

[...] Christianity was but a distortion of this main truth — that is, organized Christianity as you know it. [...]

There are systems of probability not connected with your own system at all, much more advanced than any you presently imagine, and in these, the truths of which I have been speaking are well known. [...]

[...] He (referring to Baba) is not who he says he is; nevertheless he speaks the truth. [...]

[...] (Too fast to follow.) It is dangerous to have highly distorted truth. [...]

[...] The truth is simple, is it not? [...]

[...] But consciously a group of people upon this earth managed to remember old truths. [...]

Where, from without, can truths come to you? [...]

There is no mass truth. There is only individually recognized and acknowledged and experienced truth. Ruburt once said in a poem that truth was not a great bread to be broken among many. [...]

[...] The particular vision of truth that can be received by you can be perceived by no other. [...]

In one way or another, the more powerful truths or facts of this “higher” dimension were interpreted and set down. [...]

These are ancient truths, they are behind each religion.

[...] To the adult this seems like the sheerest of nonsense; yet the child’s connections with the heroic dimension still remind him of that truth.