“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] At once I thought of trying to explore that timelessness in the only way I could as a physical creature—by, contrariwise, taking the time to list a flow of events since she had conceived the poems, putting their creativity into perspective while still feeling it as if it were new. [...]

[...] All of the questions, we thought, had a timeless quality.

[...] Those reaches of time are so great, so timeless, that I see them as another earthly analog of All That Is.

[...] The counterpart notion is Seth’s timeless version of his concept of consecutive incarnations. [...]

While some art does indeed require a good amount of experience in time, the source of that art is itself timeless. [...]

Art often appears timeless to the ego because it often merges within it a greater number of moment points than the ego can ordinarily perceive.

You both decided—and insisted upon—adding this timelessness to your lives. [...]

Just before the experience of death, timelessness, or the spacious present, begins to be perceived. [...]

[...] That primary sense data, while pinpointed in the present, providing you with the necessary stance in time, still can open up to you the timelessness from which all time emerges, can bring you intuitive intimations, hinting at the true nature of the ever-present coming-to-be of the universe.

[...] You do this in such a way that the timeless events are experienced in time, and so that they mix and merge to conform to the dimensions of your reality. [...]

[...] She said it had seemed like a timeless half-hour to her. [...]

[...] Psychological time represents on your plane the closest you can come to the experience of timelessness as far as your physical laws are concerned.

[...] The nighttime had a sublime sense of timelessness that I’d always admired. [...]

[...] Beyond Framework 1, however, exists Framework 2, and it represents the great timeless or simultaneous spacious present that’s so dearly a manifestation of All That Is. [...]

[...] One might say that I’m still obsessed with truths—as I take down the Seth material, for example—only now I call them timeless rather than ancient or new.)

[...] I think that my writing this introduction, then, is basically timeless behavior. [...]