“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Although Jane enjoys the sessions, as Seth himself said in the session for February 1, 1981 She is still somewhat afraid of what he will produce in the future—new theories and ideas that either might or will place her in further confrontation with the major tenets of our ordinary world—meaning science, religion, medicine, history, whatever. [...]

[...] We’ve heard of the theory before, by the way — but transmitting cancer in such a fashion seems to be one of the most deadly results that can follow from the union of a man and a woman. [...]

[...] Also some of the theories I will present in this discussion will be quite unfamiliar to you. [...]

[...] This remains fine theory, however, unless you allow yourself enough freedom to experiment with other modes of perception.

1. According to generally accepted scientific theory these days, our solar system is some 4.6 billion years old. [...]

[...] However, as I wrote in Note 1 for Session 709, in Volume 2 of “Unknown” Reality, “supposed faster-than-light particles are thought to be possible within the context of Einstein’s special theory of relativity.”

[...] Think in terms of your own personal reality, your own personal life and how these theories apply to who you think you are now. [...]

Your questioning, Joseph (see Note 3), and your deep distrust of the world’s current theories, are shared as intensely by Ruburt, and your joint insistence upon discovering new answers is responsible for these sessions, and what will come from them.

I remember being a little surprised at her subject matter for “The Red Wagon” — for it’s not contradictory to write here that even though she was so interested in reincarnation as a theory, we seldom talked about it. [...]

[...] This is not theory to be listened to or read and forgotten. [...]

[...] Because of the psychological theories of the last century, many Western people believed that the primary purpose of the conscious mind was to inhibit “unconscious” material.

[...] Only after such a basis will the idea of reincarnation achieve its natural validity, and only when it is understood that the subconscious, certain layers of it, is a link between the present personality and past ones, will the theory of reincarnation be accepted as fact. [...]

Now Seth comes to this point, very important in his theories: “This acquiescence to even painful stimuli is a basic part of the nature of consciousness. [...]

[...] It is much easier if your theories fit reality, but if they do not, you will not change the nature of reincarnation one iota.”

[...] Your conscious energies are focused upon the physical field, and the distortive cause and effect theory holds sway.

The idea is to be alert for psychological contents of the mind that we usually ignore, that science can’t prove or disprove … where we take experience over theory.

[...] Such theories are based upon the concept that there is something innately disruptive, base, or wrong in man’s emotional nature, while the soul is always depicted as being calm, “perfect,” passive and unfeeling. [...]

[...] As mentioned earlier in this book,¹³ the accepted theory of evolution is highly simplistic. [...]

[...] But the next episode so upset our ideas of what was possible, so outraged our conventional theories, that we very nearly quit the whole thing. [...]

A note regarding your astronauts and their latest excursion: new developments involving the ionosphere have been made during this trip, and to your scientists unpleasant ones, since they do not conform to previous theories.

[...] Now, this group worked on manuscripts officially, so to speak, but our friend here and several others were bootleg seed finders, believing against generally held theories at the time that many questions concerning nature could be found by examining nature.

[...] These are the people, you see, we want to reach, for they are young and they can learn, and they are not hampered by old theories. [...]