“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] I do not harp to you about theory simply because I want to spout theory, but because I want you to put these ideas into practice.”

As a result of such long-held theories, people have grown distrustful of their own bodies. [...]

[...] The scope, quality, and theories of the material “hooked” us almost at once.

[...] The reader will have to make his own judgments, but personally I do accept his theories as valid and significant.

[...] I hope that Seth’s theories on health will benefit all my readers, and that the material on personality will help each discover for himself the multidimensional reality that is his heritage.

[...] And the theories are not yet fully presented by any means. But the theories will be laid out, and clearly, and the methods will be laid out, and clearly. And I hope that by the time these theories are laid out, you can use them well. [...]

[...] Do not be so quick to overthrow one theory of beliefs and immediately hammer down a new set. [...]

The Trinity concept in your terms was a masculine one, projecting to the one God concept the duality which all mankind feels, but because the theory originated with the male the duality is expressed in terms of the male viewpoint.

[...] In formulating a theory concerning the primary energy gestalt, the data is distorted by the peculiar set of outer sensory equipment characteristic of any given plane of reality. [...]

[...] You have done well with theories (addressing Reverend Crosson); Now, I tell you forget them. Forget the self that has the theories...and begin to experience. [...]

[...] You have done well with theories (addressing Rev. Cross); now, I tell you to forget them. Forget the self that has the theories—and begin to experience. [...]

[...] Few would agree, however, that you can learn more about the nature of the universe by examining your own creativity than you can by examining the world through instruments — and here is exquisite irony, for you create the instruments of creativity, even while at the same time you often spout theories that deny to man all but the most mechanical of reactions.

In other terms, the world comes to know itself, to discover itself, for the Planner left room for divine surprise, and the plan was nowhere foreordained; nor is there anywhere within it anything that corresponds to your survival-of-the-fittest theories.

Ruburt’s own development makes this possible, for it was necessary that he progress to the point that he has in Adventures,² and reach the level of certain theories so that these could be used as springboards. [...]

(Jane wondered how tonight’s material applied to my mother, [who had died three months ago]: “… to Mom Butts herself — not just the theory of it … Is she in another probability now?”

[...] (It’s been stated in theory, incidentally, that although tachyons themselves travel faster than light, their radiation doesn’t. This radiation, then, the carrier of all of the information we could gather about tachyons [or similar particles], would be observable by us.)

(I added that I doubt if they really do, but that the views need integration for us to understand it all clearly as a unified theory—sort of like field theory in physics, perhaps. [...]

When it is understood that space and time are both camouflages, and that your cause and effect theory is a result of a continuity theory that no longer makes sense, then your scientists will recognize the impossibility of trying to decipher basic reality with camouflage instruments, and vehicles, that of themselves produce distortive theories, and only serve to probe further into a camouflage pattern.

[...] I have explained that the expanding universe theory contains gross error, since the universe, the real universe, is expanding; but it is expanding in terms of value fulfillment and has nothing to do with expansion in space.

[...] connected with a college, a prestige one like Princeton or Yale; and he worked on mathematical theories, and he suspected, oddly enough, that some integers or numbers had unsuspected values, and he was right.

[...] And unless I’m balled up I think 1936 is the year he published or initiated some of his theories. [...]

[...] (Fast pace.) The unrelated functions bear strong relation (Jane asked me to read this phrase back), to the underlying principles upon which the basic theories of malfunction are formed. [...]

[...] Now you may believe in the theories of Buddhism, for example, or of another Eastern philosophy.

[...] Neither theory contains an understanding of the functions of the conscious mind, or the evolution of consciousness — or, for that matter, certain aspects of greater physics. [...] The expanding universe theory¹ applies to the mind as well as to the universe.

Your interests place you in a position in which you question the theories of your times, and the people who uphold those theories are not about to seek you out. [...]

[...] He began in his own way to form his own theory concerning the nature of God and reality at a young age. He expressed these theories and feelings through poetry, which was itself an unconventional activity.

3. Seth’s “fields of consciousness” sounds like an elaboration of field theory in physics. [...]

[...] In theory it sounded fine, but naturally I knew he wanted Sally to live. [...]

[...] They had just begun classes, and while they were curious about ESP, they had little patience with the theory of reincarnation—before the session, that is.

[...] “It is much easier if your theories fit reality, but if they do not, then you do not change the nature of reincarnation one iota.” [...]

[...] Most other theories of reincarnation take the time sequence for granted. [...]

[...] In a way, it is not the kind of in-depth discussion Seth would give in one of our private sessions, but it contains an excellent thumbnail description of his theories on personality, for those who have no previous knowledge of the Seth Material. [...]

[...] Current theories regarding the nature of personality do not take into consideration the existence of telepathy or clairvoyance or the fact of reincarnation. [...]

[...] To a large extent, then, our personal experiences corroborated Seth’s theories. [...]

[...] The ideas he presented are basic to his overall theories of identity, and since he deals with some of the characteristics of consciousness, they are also a basis for later material on the God concept.

(By M.H. Her query was based on a theory that, as it happened, I’d heard of also: A group of scientists has postulated the existence of a class of subatomic particles called “tachyons,” or “meta-particles,” that always travel faster than the speed of light.

(According to the theory of relativity, no particle can be accelerated to the speed of light because its mass would become infinitely large as it approached light’s velocity; but this barrier is bypassed by stating that the particles in question have an imaginary proper mass — not rest mass — that is never less than the speed of light. [...]