“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Checking with the pendulum, she got the answer that she had received random telepathy.

[...] Here the material that I have given you on telepathy should be considered.

[...] If a “ghost” wants to contact you therefore, he can do so through telepathy, and you can yourself construct the corresponding image if you desire. [...]

[...] You see, the slight but still rather remarkable evidence of telepathy I gave you with Philip had two purposes, or one large one.

I wanted to show you that telepathy did exist, and I wanted to show Ruburt that more than his own subconscious was involved. [...]

When such abilities as telepathy occur, this telepathic function is carried on continually by this other self-conscious part of you, but as a rule you act upon such data without the knowledge of the conscious self with which you are familiar. [...]

Telepathy could be called, indeed, the glue that holds the physical universe in precarious position, so that anyone can agree upon what a particular object is, or where it is at any given time.

I want to make a point however, that the dream universe is as real and cohesive as your own, and that the same glue of telepathy holds it together, and gives it not only as much reality but validity in actual terms.

[...] Telepathy, “molecular mentality,” and cellular consciousness are deeply involved in all of this.

I told you that without telepathy language would be meaningless and ineffective. [...] It is also true however, that through continuous telepathy you are acquainted with the ideas of others concerning their approximate physical universes; and while you construct and see your own, you also construct any given material object taking into consideration its approximate size, width, thickness and location, as received through telepathy from others.

(“Was there any element of telepathy involved between you and me, in the test this evening?”)

[...] In many instances however data can be received in either manner, and telepathy may well be involved in other tests. [...]

[...] Seth discussed several psychic experiences Bill had noted recently, saying they involved telepathy and precognition. [...]

[...] Telepathy may or may not, according to the circumstances. [...]

I wanted to make one point, but first, there is nothing like a witness to convince my darling nervous Ruburt that I am I, and not her, meaning Jane; like a good evidence of telepathy, as in John’s case this evening.

Why then do you insist that an inner experience such as telepathy or premonition does not exist because you cannot hold it in both hands? [...]

[...] We communicate telepathically, but then again, telepathy is the basis for your languages, without which their symbolism would be meaningless.

(According to this material, I told her, if one paid attention to this sort of thing, good evidence for telepathy could be achieved. [...]

Those “properties” are the faculties of the imagination, creativity, telepathy, clairvoyance, and dreaming, as well as the functions of logic and reason. [...]

[...] Since telepathy exists (as described in Chapter Three), the subject will react not only to verbal commands but to the unspoken beliefs of the practitioner, thereby “proving,” of course, the hypnotist’s theory of what his profession is.

Now: you must understand, for one thing, that telepathy operates constantly at a subconscious level. [...]

[...] You would still like to believe in the importance of suggestion and telepathy, but only when it suits your purposes, and to minimize it in those areas that are somewhat touchy.

[...] Also throughout these first few pages, I believe I experienced quite a few instances of telepathy; I would catch a phrase for instance just before Jane uttered the same words.)

[...] As telepathy operates constantly at a subconscious level, as a basis for all language and communication, so clairvoyance operates continually so that the physical organism can prepare itself to face its challenges.

[...] Not only was telepathy involved, then. [...]

[...] I am trying to give you some insight into how a seemingly trivial event takes place, how telepathy and expectation enter in. [...]

[...] As I have said often, evidence of clairvoyance, telepathy, or whatever, are not eccentric, isolated instances occurring in man’s experience, but are representative of natural patterns of everyday behavior that become invisible in your world because of the official picture of behavior and reality.