“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Many illnesses of a chronic nature exist in the same fashion, and the answers are philosophical ones and subjective illuminations. [...]

[...] As we sat discussing the subject, Jane began to dictate again. [...]

You did not ask me for a session, but it is a stormy night, so that along the way I touch on a few “stormy” subjects, though with a light hand.

[...] I asked no questions before the session, nor did Jane, but we were still surprised at the subject matter.)

[...] Unless you have further questions I will end the session—which I devoted to the subject for your edification.

If in your private subjective reality you label yourself, unthinkingly now, in too-limited a fashion, then you can see yourself for example as the isolated artist at the brunt of society, the misunderstood poet that must be protected from the world’s ways—mythic material that falls short. [...]

[...] I have given more material than I can say on the subject of Ruburt’s attitude toward creativity and what happens when he emphasizes the idea of work as work, or as a career, above his spontaneous creativity. [...]

[...] I’d been concerned lest Jane become involved in an unpleasant situation that would have repercussions via symptoms —the idea of publicity, of public display, which she doesn’t want—just when we were trying to learn more about the subject as she reacted to it. [...]

[...] The painting I am working on now features a cadmium red shirt on the subject, and has given me some trouble because of its tendency to turn purplish if not watched; since Jane has seen me at work on this portrait often, she may have picked this up, although I haven’t mentioned it to her. [...]

[...] She was quite surprised, since Atlantis is a subject sort of suspect to her because of the Edgar Cayce connotations, etc.)

Do you have any questions on that particular subject?

[...] Helping people who have died, in your terms, speaking to others who are quite alive, in the dream state, learning to understand and manipulate subjective realities. [...]

Now: I will cover the subject of ghosts separately, rather than in this chapter. [...]

(As it turned out, we didn’t ask Seth about promotion work again, and he didn’t bring up the subject himself. [...]

[...] The information, however, is extremely valuable, and knowledge on any kind of subject is available in just such a manner — but it is attained through desire and through intent.

Jane worked less and less as the holiday season approached, although on December 15 she gave her fourth private session; its most evocative subject matter—art and child psychology—is separate from our themes for Dreams. [...]

[...] When you dream or sleep or think, you automatically add to other dimensions of a life cloud or dream cloud that emerge from the very actions of your own subjective motions.

I like that entire poem, of course—but in a different way I like just as much the untitled poem Jane wrote on a different subject almost 15 years later (on August 25, 1980). [...]

[...] Although she seldom translates them into English, I know their subject matter. [...]

I’m dealing with this subject, the nature of physical matter, first, because it is basic to any understanding of Seth’s theories. [...]

[...] I thought that the whole subject was fascinating when he began, but I didn’t expect a demonstration in the middle of our living room, which is exactly what happened in the 68th session (July 6, 1964). [...]

[...] Jane subjectively feels this is the correct interpretation. [...]

[...] Jane said she was subjectively sure this was another reference to my mother, who caused Leonard to author the object. [...]

[...] For purposes of analogy only, imagine that each subconscious layer is personified into a personality, who is then subjected to rendition of a dream or more, who watches a screen upon which the dream images flicker.

[...] As mentioned many, many sessions ago, however, her poem The Fence, written in May 1963, clearly foreshadows the Seth material, dealing with [but not always by outright name] such subjects as reincarnation, dreams, unperceived worlds, etc. [...]

[...] Our subject of interest itself was largely denied validity by the social, psychological, and scientific establishments. [...]

[...] Some of them subjectively feel right to me; they effortlessly mirror or echo the way the Jane I lived with for almost thirty years often talked and wrote. [...]

[...] The most parsimonious view — the simplest, stingiest one — would be that through studying the Seth Material Valerie subconsciously divines the replies I want from my dead wife, and in all subjective innocence comes through with her trance messages for me, to fit my own stubborn belief in Jane’s survival.