“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Subject: Viruses as part of the body’s overall health system, and viruses as biological statements.

[...] During this period she had a variety of subjective experiences, and is dealing with some of them in notes of her own. [...]

[...] We will get on with some other subjects. [...]

Philosophically and practically there are many ramifications on this subject that I hope to cover, but what I have said for now applies. [...]

(One of the subjects discussed at break concerned the degree of “permanence” of the physical human form.)

[...] I read Jane the title of Chapter Twenty-two, thinking that its indicated subject matter meant Seth was close to finishing his book….)

[...] Returning at 11:03, Seth finished his evening’s work by speaking on other subjects until 11:28 P.M.)

(9:58.) There are biological possibilities, seldom activated in your present circumstances, that have some bearing upon the subject at hand.

(Now Seth moved from his own book to this new subject — Jane’s The World View of Paul Cézanne — with ease and obvious zest. [...]

[...] Ruburt has no exterior framework to judge his subjective experience against, for even when he was in the church his experience did not fit the mold.

[...] In fact, I think his material and insights into the species’ behavior is the only sensible body of material on the subject that can stand questioning and understanding—no small achievement, as I often remind Jane. [...]

(I also planned to start reviewing the first deleted sessions Seth gave on Jane’s symptoms, for I’ve never really forgotten them and always felt they were as good as any Seth has ever given on those subjects. [...]

[...] A humorous repartee followed, with Seth answering our questions on a variety of subjects. [...]

[...] The malfunction the result of subconscious associations on the part of the subject. (Pause.)

[...] He had a long talk with the company executive, but money was not the specific subject of the conversation.

[...] This is meant as a general statement however, for you are all subject to fluctuating circumstances, and are more or less able to use your abilities.

[...] Jane is subjectively sure Seth was getting at the name of Mrs. Marilyn Wilbur, who lives with her husband Don in Wellsburg; the Wilburs are good friends of ours. [...]

Before I got around to asking Seth about whether or not Peter Smith and I were counterparts, Sue had enough time to do some thinking of her own about the subject. [...]

[...] So, theoretically, you could get all the Henry people together now, have them alter their consciousnesses to a certain degree, and compile from them an amazing multilevel, multifaceted portrait of Henry VIII — assuming, of course, that one would be willing to accept such subjective experiences as valid. [...]

[...] Although reincarnation and its variations has been discussed by Seth almost from the very beginning of our sessions, the subject didn’t represent one of our own main concerns. [...]

All of which reminds me that to many viewers the “portraits” I paint are balanced equally between the masculine and feminine, regardless of whether the subject in any one of them is male or female. [...]

The following basic subjects are necessary for an understanding of what we are trying to say, particularly for any practical application: the construction of physical matter; the psychological and electrical gestalt that results in the formation of a self; the nature of the dream universe; the electrical system, as it is related to both the physical universe and the inner psychic gestalt; the nature of action; mental enclosures; mental genes; and again, all of these subjects in relationship to their reality as action.

[...] She’d also been picking up from Seth through the day some quite amused comments on a variety of subjects we’d mentioned, ranging from “carpets and health” to the “nature of the law, the connection between the law and ideals and their actualization; the reactions of Tam Mossman to our feelings about Fate Magazine,” etc.

While we are somewhat on the subject, I have not forgotten that we have left behind our discussions on the inner senses, and really with good reason. [...]