“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] But I haven’t heard a word on the subject from her. [...]

This subject is a part of one that I plan as an evening’s discussion. [...]

(I remembered very little about the bow, yet subjectively I was sure it had been taken from a greeting card of some kind. [...]

[...] I also felt subjectively that the ribbon came from my place of employment, though I cannot prove this at the moment on my own. [...]

This has been somewhat, though not too far, off the subject. [...]

[...] For this reason we have curtailed our questions concerning a quick explanation on any subject that might interest us at the moment. [...]

[...] subjective interpretation. [...]

The book will yield a tremendous amount of psychological knowledge, for little if at all has been done to explain the subjective personality ...

[...] Therefore, in a way, your body was subjected to stress that it did not need, as the message was translated into physical terms of discomfort. [...]

[...] Now, I will give you some information on the subject, though it is too late this evening, and if you want some specific exercises that you personally can use, I do not know that you will smell as sweet as a rose on your return, but we will see to it that you get the exercises. [...]

[...] [This is usually the case when I don’t take notes.] One such point had to do with Seth’s statement that whenever a person thinks strongly about another person, a portion of the “thinker” goes out to the “thought-subject,” etc.

[...] “Go ahead,” I said, and Seth delivered material on several other subjects. [...]

[...] It certainly furnishes ideal subject matter for the media. [...]

[...] Our sessions will deal with the subject matter I have outlined. [...]

[...] She thought he had more material on the subject ready but did not want to start in on it now. [...]

[...] I will also have more to say on that subject later.

[...] Our friend Ruburt has finally discovered the works of Dunne, I see, and he has also been reading Priestley on the subject of time.

[...] He elaborated to some degree in the sessions on the electrical field and related subjects: In Volume 3, see sessions 122-135.)

[...] He places the subject under the general term of fifth dimension. [...]

[...] He also dwelled on the subject to some extent in the 152nd session, the 157th, and others. [...]

[...] As Seth tells us after break, the old reference concerns Bill Gallagher’s subjective feelings on his birthday last July 1. The letter reference here stems from the resemblance of the typed poem used as object to a letter, and echoes the note data, also discussed on page 57.

[...] Seth is correct, in that the old reference here does concern Bill Gallagher and his subjective feelings [the male], on the evening of his birthday party, for which the envelope object was written. [...]

[...] Here’s what I wrote at 9:55 in the 24th session for February 10, 1964: “Jane reports that when she pauses for Seth during a delivery, she can sense the whole concept of the subject being discussed. Subjectively, it appears to ‘hang over her.’ Since on those occasions it’s too much to handle at once, however, she feels Seth withdrawing it, to release it to her a little at a time in the form of connected words.”

[...] Jane and I have known Sue since 1965, yet as far as any of us could remember [and for whatever reasons], the subject of double dreaming had never been discussed among us.

[...] Rather than material on the dreams themselves, I chose the first paragraphs in which Sue outlines the subjective framework of the whole dream event:

The inner ego directs all activities which are deeply subjective. [...]

(Jane, the Gallaghers and I were discussing the session and related subjects when Seth came through again at 11:00. [...]

It might help if you remember that despite appearances all events are basically subjective. [...]

[...] Our work should end up to some extent illuminating many fields of knowledge and interest, because it is not directed to one or another subject matter, and certainly not restricted to information that must be immediately utilitarian. [...]

[...] This is a general statement, subject to some specific alterations. [...]