“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

You would learn little of what it means subjectively to be a human being by simply studying a picture of one. And you learn little of basic reality by studying the physical universe as if it were more than a symbol of what it represents.

[...] In fact, we’ve had trouble keeping up with our experiences, and little time to study them. [...]

Now last Sunday evening, as I studied that “old” drawing of myself, I thought once more of my father in his last days — then a whole block of information came to me regarding his present nonphysical circumstances and “plans.” [...]

[...] It isn’t necessary to study those two events in detail here, however.

This will indeed be a brief session, but I did want to give it to you before you seriously began studying this group. [...]

[...] But more study is required here, and with this knowledge in mind, we will try to more accurately assess the table’s performance at future sessions.

[...] We want to keep the table to maintain this contact, even if casually, and for further study on pressure angles, etc. [...]

The remarks are these—We will and we have, to a very small extent here, begun a study of multidimensional psychology...and it will be the psychology of the future for it will regard personality in its true and entire light. [...]

Now you may or may not realize that here we have made a small, a very small, start in the study of multidimensional personality. [...]

[...] I also learned that once I began to study it, a great amount of material presented itself seemingly without effort on my part, the information ranged all the way from paleontological studies to current biological research on recombinant DNA, and I found it in newspapers, scientific journals and popular magazines, in books and even on television. [...]

[...] Although she left Appendix 6 unfinished, it contains many ideas worth more study: “Some of the experiments with man-animals didn’t work out along our historic lines, but the ghost memories of those probabilities still linger in our biological structure … The growth of ego consciousness by itself set up both challenges and limitations … For many centuries there was no clear-cut differentiation between various aspects of man and animal … there were parallel developments in the emergence of physical man … there were innumerable species of man-in-the-making in your terms….” [...]

[...] Each of us is seen to be truly unique — but at the same time those studying biological evolution express concern about whether their discoveries will challenge Darwinistic beliefs. [...]

You are well acquainted with the exterior method, that involves studying the objective universe and collecting facts upon which certain deductions are made. [...]

You have been given an opportunity to study life and to experience it more fully than you ever have before in this existence. [...]

The body often wears out because it has been used less and less — and that is because little study has been given to the true capabilities of the healthy physical body in the later years of life. [...]

When reincarnational studies are embarked upon, on occasion people remember some instance of past-life experience, but conventional ideas of time are so strong that so-called future memory is blacked out.

The essay form gave us chances for at least a minimal study of the various forms our creative learning experiences have taken to date. [...]

[...] On that level they are studying the ways in which beliefs and feelings are translated into living reality. [...]

[...] You disliked her heartily but the fascination kept at you, so that you studied her mannerisms, and even at times tried to copy them.

[...] The more I study those, the more I realize how good they are.

[...] He was indeed a lawyer, but also was involved involved in psychic studies with a group in Cleveland called the Brothers of the Fourth Order, and he is particularly interested in the manipulation of physical matter. [...]

It is not to say that you cannot understand the nature of the universe to some extent, but the answers lie in the natures of your own minds, in the processes of individual creativity, in studies that ask questions like: “Where did this thought come from? [...]

[...] The Seth material is a long way from being on computer—if that ever happens—and relatively few readers will make the journey to Yale University Library, to study the collection of Jane’s and my papers that’s available there for anyone to see.

[...] (Originally Luke composed his Gospel and Acts as one treatise; the two were separated early in the second century.) Out of such contradictions as those implied in Luke’s case, however, confusion and opposing opinions reign when one studies the Gospels and related material. [...]

[...] A study of the New Testament books alone can quickly lead one into a maze of questions: Why isn’t the resurrection itself described? [...]

You (both) are studying the nature of creativity as few others have done or can do—and that is bound to make possible new creative frameworks, and to offer new solutions to situations that cause difficulty only within smaller frameworks. [...]

[...] If you think that tomorrow Johnny F will misbehave in study hall, you should, in your mind, replace this with the image of Johnny F behaving very well. [...]

He was a study, a living example, of the effects of conflicting unexamined beliefs, a fierce and yet agonized personification of what can happen when an individual allows his conscious mind to deny its responsibilities — i.e., when an individual becomes afraid of his own consciousness.