“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Nor, strictly speaking, is such omnipotence possible.”

[...] The last session in that baker’s dozen was delivered by Seth on June 7. Most of the sessions are rather short, and not all of them are strictly personal. [...]

[...] He told Bill that it would require strict discipline on his part if he worked with computers in such a fashion.

[...] If it were strictly necessary that would be one thing. [...]

[...] Nor, strictly speaking, is such omnipotence possible. [...]

[...] Almost from the beginning, however, I did anticipate what the board was going to “say,” and the poem is as valid as any strictly factual statement I could make about those sessions — if not more so.

In a strict sense, Claire’s dreams may or may not have been precognitive. [...]

[...] Nor, and this is strictly for the record, since I know that you both understand this, nor am I any so-called spirit.

[...] In the past he was so bound to the conscious ego that in fiction he found it difficult to write anything that was not strictly autobiographical.

Jane had to renew her very strict control each time she tried to transmit long data, however; I could see that otherwise she’d slide into an extremely slow delivery. [...]

[...] On page 293, Volume 5, he stated that he is hardly omnipotent—“Nor, strictly speaking, is such omnipotence possible.” [...]

(I think it more than a coincidence that in these excerpts from Seth Speaks, Seth mentions Darwin’s theory of evolution and the Biblical story of creation in the same sentence, for those systems of belief represent the two poles of the controversy over origins in our modern Western societies: the strictly Darwinistic, mechanistic view of evolution, in which the weakest of any species are ruthlessly eliminated through natural, predatory selection, and the views of the creationists, who hold that God made the earth and all of its creatures just as described in the Bible.

[...] Although risks may be present in DNA research, such as the unforeseen creation of new diseases, it seems that within strict safeguards recombinant techniques are here to stay.

[...] So it’s obvious, then, that Politics jumps ahead of “Unknown” Reality as far as a strictly correct publishing chronology is concerned.

[...] In Dreams, “Evolution, “… I stuck to Jane’s production of the Seth Material for that work, plus a strict chronological account of our personal lives while she delivered it. [...]

Through such relationships, for example, say, the cavemen and the people of the 22nd century rub elbows, where in strict terms of time the species would seem to be quite disconnected from its “earlier” or “later” counterparts.